Our project uses an ecological belonging intervention that requires one class session to implement and has been shown to eliminate equity gaps in student outcomes in introductory STEM courses. We describe disparate impacts on outcomes as equity gaps because they exist not from any deficit of the students themselves but rather due to systemic issues of marginalization. Our NSF IUSE: EDU Program, Institutional, and Community Transformation track grant brings this intervention into engineering where during the grant period we have implemented the intervention at three strategically chosen universities in both first- and second-year engineering courses. The intervention focuses on common challenges faced by students in engineering and is introduced by instructors early in the semester. Our research has demonstrated that the intervention is effective during the first year in supporting belonging for Black, Latiné, and Indigenous (BLI) students and in reducing equity gaps in academic performance during a first-year programming course. Our research has also demonstrated that BLI students who receive the intervention have improved help-seeking behaviors and are more likely to be retained in engineering into the second college year and that women students who receive the intervention may have more positive self-efficacy.
Our project is comprehensive in the development and delivery of the ecological belonging intervention and in the study of its effects. We use focus groups to understand challenges engineering students face in their courses and in different institutional contexts to contextualize the intervention specifically to each course in which it is delivered. We also provide instructor onboarding and training to deliver the intervention which includes an overview of the theoretical frameworks that undergird the intervention and how those theoretical properties are actualized and delivered during the intervention. These efforts along with the rest of our training are aimed at increasing implementation fidelity as we hypothesize that the intervention is most effective when fidelity is high. Our work is guided by a theory-of-action that is the backbone of the project’s research activities and iterative processes of improvement. We use a synergistic mixture of qualitative and quantitative methods to study both student and faculty outcomes.
To expand on understanding the impacts of the intervention on students, we have recently begun to examine how students experience the intervention, if they remember it, what they remember about it, and what they feel they gained from it. In this paper, we provide an overview of our findings in this area using data collected from surveys of two first-year engineering programming courses at two study institutions and focus groups and interviews with students at the third institution where the intervention is being implemented within second-year courses in specific engineering majors. We will also report on our continued research on the efficacy of the intervention on student outcomes. In their totality, the results of this work can provide actionable strategies for reducing equity gaps in students' degree attainment and achievement in engineering.
The full paper will be available to logged in and registered conference attendees once the conference starts on June 22, 2025, and to all visitors after the conference ends on June 25, 2025