Presenters will share insights on using assessments and other student feedback to improve courses and curricula.
Assessment and Learning Analytics: Frameworks and Interdisciplinary Approaches
This special session focuses on developing and implementing targeted interventions to better support the mental health of engineering undergraduate students. Research indicates that engineering students face unique stressors which can significantly impact their well-being and academic performance. This special session is designed to equip engineering educators with practical, easy-to implement strategies to better support students. Participants will engage in discussions, share best practices, and receive resources to create a more supportive learning environment.
For those interested in: Broadening Participation in Engineering and Engineering Technology
Dr. Jessica Deters is an Assistant Professor of Mechanical & Materials Engineering at the University of Nebraska – Lincoln. She is a Disciplinary Based Education Research (DBER) faculty member in the College of Engineering at UNL and advises students in the Engineering Education Research Ph.D. Program. Deters holds her PhD in Engineering Education and a M.S. in Systems Engineering from Virginia Tech and a B.S. in Applied Mathematics and Statistics from the Colorado School of Mines.
Tareq Daher graduated from the University of Mutah – Jordan with a B.S. in Computer Science with a focus on developing educational tools. He pursued a Master’s Degree in Educational Studies at the University of Nebraska -Lincoln (UNL). While pursing his Master Degree he worked as the coordinator
for the student technology program on the UNL campus, where he taught over 150 workshops on technology uses in the classroom to faculty, staff and students. Dr. Daher completed his Ph.D. in Educational Studies with a focus on Instructional technology from UNL and is currently serving as the Director of
... (continued)
Engineering education research teams seek to revolutionize engineering departments through the implementation of existing EngEd research, use of organizational and cultural change theories, and production of new knowledge [1], [2]. Given the extent of these goals, EngEd teams are composed of researchers, administrators, and instructors from a range of disciplines (e.g., engineering, EngEd, psychology) [1], [2], [3]. Each of these team members bring their own approaches to the generation, expression, and application of knowledge. These differences in thinking are key to the success of EngEd projec ... (continued)
Dr. Courtney Faber is an Assistant Professor of Engineering Education at the University at Buffalo. She has a PhD in Engineering & Science Education and 10 years of experience teaching engineering and collaborating on engineering education research projects. During this time, she has led 7 conference workshops/special sessions. She has been studying how EngEd research groups negotiate differences in thinking for the last 2.5 years and during this time has developed and led two workshops related to this topic.
Dr. Danielle Lewis is the Postdoctoral Associate in Dr. Courtney Faber's research lab in the Department of Engineering Education at the University at Buffalo where she supports research on epistemic identity and culture. She has worked on several interdisciplinary research teams and has co-facilitated workshops on writing for publication. Prior to earning her PhD in Higher Education, she worked as an administrator collaborating with faculty across 30 departments in UB’s College of Arts and Sciences.
Lorna Treffert is a 2nd year PhD student in Engineering Education and has a B.S./M.S. in Industrial and Systems Engineering. She has 3 years of engineering education research experience and 4 years of experience leading K-12 out-of-school-time learning experiences. She has helped develop two workshops related to how research teams negotiate differences in thinking.
Hands-on Learning and Industry-Relevant in ECE Curriculum Development
All program and division chairs are welcome to stop by to share the highlights of the conference and best practices with the PIC Chairpersons.
Specific Topics of Discussion will involve:
• Workshops: In Fall of 2024, the PICs piloted a new workshop application template and rubric in a first attempt to streamline the process. All are welcome to drop in and chat about this, network with other divisions, and discuss improvements to the template and rubric for 2026.
• PIC Best Paper Journal: We have wonderful authors who contribute a great deal of time and expertise to ASEE through their papers. ... (continued)
This session examines strategies for middle school preservice teachers to overcome student idea fixation, elementary teacher learning for translanguaging in engineering, facilitation of students’ epistemic engineering practices, and teachers’ lived experiences implementing culturally relevant engineering design to foster equity and deeper engagement in K-12 classrooms.
Systemic change, or systems-level culture changes are often the goals of engineering education studies and projects. However, the activities of these projects often focus on one element of the larger system, typically the student experience. The student experience is a keystone of engineering education, but student level changes have only a small impact on the larger systems in place. This illuminates a tension between the stated vision and the actual ability to impact the systemic structures perpetuating inequitable access to, experiences within, and outcomes of engineering environments. Our pos ... (continued)
For those interested in: Advocacy and Policy, Broadening Participation in Engineering and Engineering Technology, and New Members
These papers focus on building connections and community between faculty and with teaching centers.
This session will focus on how participatory research methods (e.g., photovoice) can be leveraged to elevate the participant voices during research and intervention development. Using the prior work of the facilitators as a guide, attendees will see how centering narratives can lead to impactful community change. In true participatory action research fashion, this will be part two of a living visual-based session that requires two parts. In the first workshop, we will have introduced participants to Photovoice, which empowers individuals by capturing their experiences through photography and focu ... (continued)
For those interested in: Advocacy and Policy, Broadening Participation in Engineering and Engineering Technology, and New Members
Dr. Jeremy A. Magruder Waisome is the Thomas O. Hunter Rising Star Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at the University of Florida (UF) in the Herbert Wertheim College of Engineering. Dr. Waisome leads the PRISEM Lab, where her research focuses on broadening participation in science, technology, engineering, mathematics, and computing (STEM+C). Her primary research interests include understanding the influence of mentoring and self-efficacy on student trajectories and interests in STEM+C. She is a member of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine ... (continued)
Dr. Jerrod A. Henderson is an Assistant Professor in the William A. Brookshire Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering in the Cullen College of Engineering at the University of Houston (UH). Dr. Henderson has dedicated his career to increasing the number of students who are in pathways to pursue STEM careers. He believes that exposing students to STEM early will have a lasting impact on their lives and academic pursuits. He began his higher education pursuits at Morehouse College and North Carolina Agricultural & Technical State University, where he earned degrees in both Chemistr ... (continued)
The finalists for this year's Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Best Paper Award will be presented in this session.
For those interested in: Broadening Participation in Engineering and Engineering Technology
The Program Chair Appreciation Session is a celebratory event designed to recognize and honor the individuals who have significantly contributed to the structure and success of the ASEE Annual Conference. It provides an opportunity to acknowledge their hard work, build community, and inspire future involvement in organizing and shaping ASEE events. By appreciating the efforts of the Program Chairs, the session highlights the value of leadership, collaboration, and dedication to advancing the field of engineering education.
The ASEE Annual Conference President's Farewell Reception caps off another dynamic conference. It offers an opportunity for attendees to come together and reflect on the conference experience while also bidding farewell to the outgoing ASEE President Grant Crawford.
This event serves as a way to honor the leadership of President Crawford and Pass the Gavel to President-Elect Christi Patton-Luks, marking the conclusion of another successful conference.