2026 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

AI-Driven Climate Resilience Education: A Framework for Predictive Thinking in Engineering Classrooms

Presented at CIT Technical Session 4: Capacity Building, and Skill Development.

Engineering education often emphasizes design and analysis while giving limited attention to predictive and adaptive decision-making in response to climate change. As transportation systems face increasing weather-related disruptions, there is a growing need to prepare future engineers to reason about climate resilience using data-driven tools.
This work introduces the AI-Driven Climate Resilience Education (AICRE) framework, a pedagogical approach designed to support climate-resilient engineering decision-making through the use of artificial intelligence and real-world data. The framework was implemented as a work-in-progress instructional approach within an undergraduate engineering course focused on data-driven systems analysis. In this context, AI techniques serve as analytical tools to help students interpret climate-related data, anticipate system disruptions, and evaluate adaptive responses.
Students will engage in project-based learning activities using datasets from the Federal Aviation Administration and Open-Meteo Statistics to examine weather-induced disruptions in air transportation systems. Guided modules introduced students to predictive modeling concepts, including logistic regression and random forest methods, as a means of supporting climate-informed decision-making rather than as standalone technical outcomes. Evaluation methods will include pre- and post-activity surveys, reflective journals, and analysis of team project artifacts.
Preliminary observations from the ongoing implementation drawn from qualitative coding of student activity responses (N = 17), indicate considerable variation in student engagement across the framework's four components. Uncertainty communication about model limitations emerged broadly across the cohort, with 59% of students acknowledging prediction error or the conditional nature of model outputs without direct prompting. However, the predictive interpretation component which requires reasoning about future system behavior under changing climate conditions showed the lowest activation rate, with 47% of students producing no substantive response. These findings point to specific instructional refinements needed to support the full AICRE learning cycle in future implementations.

Authors
  1. Raj Bariya Morgan State University [biography]
  2. Samuel Sola Akosile Morgan State University [biography]
  3. Sarah Halleluyah Adeyemi Morgan State University [biography]
  4. Dr. Kofi Nyarko Morgan State University [biography]
  5. Dr. DeAnna Bailey Morgan State University [biography]
Note

The full paper will be available to logged in and registered conference attendees once the conference starts on June 21, 2026, and to all visitors after the conference ends on June 24, 2026