2026 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Ethical Use of Artificial Intelligence in Engineering Education: A Systematic Review

Presented at DSAI-Session 4: Ethics, Policy, and the AI-Integrated Engineering Workforce

The growing integration of generative artificial intelligence (AI) in engineering education has prompted increased attention to its role in teaching, learning, and assessment. As these tools become more widely adopted, scholarly discourse has shifted from questions of feasibility to concerns about the ethical, responsible, and pedagogically sound use of AI. This study presents a systematic review of the engineering education literature on how ethical guidance concerning AI use is articulated at institutional and instructional levels. Guided by PRISMA 2020 protocols, the review screened 2,158 articles published between 2000 and 2025 across eight databases. Of the 696 articles screened for full-text eligibility, 99 addressed ethical guidance for AI use in the engineering classroom. Inductive analysis of these articles revealed seven recurring themes: transparency and disclosure of AI use; faculty and student accountability and human oversight; student autonomy and agency; confidentiality and student data protection; academic integrity and authorship; fairness, equity, and bias mitigation; and beneficence, safety, and student wellbeing. Across these themes, integrity, accountability, and transparency were the most frequently emphasized aspects of ethical AI use, while beneficence and student autonomy received comparatively limited attention. Furthermore, findings indicate that ethical considerations in AI-enabled engineering education are fragmented and inconsistently articulated. Many guidelines were primarily student-facing and focused on academic integrity, disclosure, and misuse prevention, with less attention to reciprocal faculty accountability, institutional responsibility, and the broader pedagogical conditions needed for responsible AI integration. This imbalance is particularly consequential in engineering education, where instructional practices help prepare future engineers responsible for public safety, infrastructure reliability, and societal wellbeing. Overall, the findings highlight a critical gap between growing ethical awareness of AI risks and the absence of coherent, reciprocal ethical frameworks in engineering education practice. Addressing this gap will require institutions and accrediting bodies to adopt dynamic, human-centered frameworks that integrate ethical principles into pedagogy and assessment, strengthen ethical literacy among faculty and students, and promote shared human-AI accountability to support responsible, socially aligned AI integration in engineering education.
Keywords: Professional Responsibility, Institutional Policy, Classroom Practice, Equity and Access

Authors
  1. VINCENT OLUWASETO FAKIYESI University of Georgia [biography]
  2. ISAAC DAMILARE DUNMOYE University of Georgia [biography]
  3. Mary Ifeoma Nwanua University of Florida
  4. MARY OLOYEDE Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
  5. Bolaji Ruth Bamidele Utah State University [biography]
  6. Dr. Nathaniel Hunsu The University of Georgia [biography]
Note

The full paper will be available to logged in and registered conference attendees once the conference starts on June 21, 2026, and to all visitors after the conference ends on June 24, 2026