2026 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

"Measure Twice, Cut Once" and other Disciplinary Barriers to Recognizing Excellence in Engineering Education Research

Presented at Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division (LEES) Technical Session 1

This paper began as a request for advice about how to navigate the tenure and promotion (T&P) process as an engineering education researcher (EER) and transformed into a Reflective Thematic Analysis (Braun et al., 2022) of five institutionally contextualized EER narratives. Together, our five stories make EER work visible as research to those responsible for our job security and advancement. Our analysis of these experiences is rooted in four key concepts: (1) Lave and Wenger’s (1991) situated learning in a community of practice, (2) Gouldner’s (1957) analysis of academics’ latent social roles, (3) Riley’s (2017) critique of academic rigor as a marker of excellence, and (4) Rottmann et al.’s (2023) notion of proud moments as a strategy for grounding excellence in our lived experiences. The overarching story emerging from our analysis involves EER scholars on the periphery of traditional engineering norms who nevertheless fight to remain locally relevant, carving out space for our emerging field and the next generation. We conclude with practical strategies for early career EER researchers navigating the T&P process and for T&P chairs and reviewers assessing the quality of EER research portfolios.

Authors
  1. Dr. Justin L Hess Orcid 16x16http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1210-9535 Purdue University – West Lafayette (College of Engineering) [biography]
Note

The full paper will be available to logged in and registered conference attendees once the conference starts on June 21, 2026, and to all visitors after the conference ends on June 24, 2026

« View session

For those interested in:

  • Advocacy and Policy
  • Broadening Participation in Engineering and Engineering Technology
  • Faculty
  • Graduate
  • engineering