Session Description

Free ticketed event
This panel session will share the collaborative work being accomplished by two academic
institutions to decarbonize their own campuses and the surrounding community while shifting
the academic paradigm to equip energy engineers and others to accelerate the global energy
transition. The ASEE Conference theme of "Engineering Educators Bringing the World
Together” is fitting for this discussion.

For those interested in: Academia-Industry Connections, Advocacy and Policy, and Broadening Participation in Engineering and Engineering Technology

Moderated by

1. Dr. Glenn T. Wrate P.E.

Speakers

1. Peter John Garforth

   Peter Garforth is Principal of a specialist consultancy based in Toledo, Ohio, and Brussels, Belgium. He is also a founding board member of an affiliate consultancy in Guelph, Ontario. He advises major companies, cities, communities, colleges, property developers and policymakers on developing competitive approaches that reduce the economic and environmental impact of energy use. Peter has long been interested in energy productivity and sustainability and has a considerable track record establishing successful businesses and programs in the United States, Canada, Europe, Indonesia, India, Brazil, ... (continued)

2. Michael A. Nealon

   Henry Ford College

   Dr. Michael A. Nealon serves as Vice President of Academic Affairs and Chief Academic Officer at Heny Ford College (Dearborn, MI). Dr. Nealon brings nearly 30 years of college-level teaching and administrative experience to the post, having previously taught at Lansing Community College, DePaul University (Chicago, IL), Northwestern University (Evanston, IL), and North Park College and Seminary (Chicago, IL). Nealon earned a PhD in Musicology from Northwestern University in 1997. He holds a Master’s degree from the University of Tennessee at Knoxville and a Bachelor of Arts from St. Michael’s College (Colchester, VT).

3. Reuben Brukley

   Henry Ford College

   Reuben Brukley is the Facilities Director at Henry Ford College in Dearborn, Michigan. He is responsible for overseeing construction, sustainability, and all aspects of campus property management. Since assuming the Director’s role in 2019, he has overseen sustainability efforts with breakthrough results across all areas of the College for which he is responsible. Reuben has 25+ years of progressive facilities experience.

4. Nicholas Paseiro

   Henry Ford College

   Nicholas Paseiro is an Energy Technology Instructor at Henry Ford College overseeing the implementation of the academic plan for college's Integrated Energy Master Plan. During his career, he has worked in both the private sector and state and federal government in the fields of energy management, environmental policy, sustainable design, and code enforcement. He also works as a sustainability consultant for various projects in the US.

5. Herbert Sinnock

   Sheridan College

   Herb Sinnock is Director Sustainability at Sheridan College. For more than a decade he has been responsible for implementation of Mission Zero, the institution’s ambitious plan to reduce energy consumption, waste to landfill and eliminate greenhouse gas emissions. Prior to joining Sheridan College, he was Manager of the Centennial Energy Institute at Centennial College in Scarborough, Ontario. With nearly 30 years of experience in the energy sector, Herb has worked in project management, technology research and product development for projects funded by Ontario Centres of Excellence, Ontario Powe ... (continued)

Session Description

The Engineering and Public Policy (EPP) division will host a session to present and prompt discussion of topics related to (1) policies that support students and faculty in engineering education, (2) creating systemic change in STEM higher education, and (3) policy issues with significant technological and engineering components. The session will be interactive, including small group discussions and questions from the audience.

For those interested in: Academia-Industry Connections, Advocacy and Policy, Broadening Participation in Engineering and Engineering Technology, and New Members

Session Description

This panel discussion, titled "Next-Gen Learning: AI and Data Science in Academia," will delve into the revolutionary impact of artificial intelligence (AI) and data science on higher education. As these cutting-edge technologies continue to evolve, their integration within academic environments holds the promise of transforming teaching methodologies, enhancing research capabilities, and personalizing student learning experiences. Esteemed experts and thought leaders in AI and data science will examine the latest trends, address current challenges, and explore future possibilities. Att ... (continued)

For those interested in: Academia-Industry Connections, Broadening Participation in Engineering and Engineering Technology, New Members, and Pre-College

Moderated by

1. Mr. Richard R Harris

Speakers

1. Dr. Sagar V. Kamarthi

   Northeastern University

   Associate Dean for Graduate Education
   Professor of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering
   College of Engineering
   Northeastern University, Boston

2. Prof. Gregory L. Heileman

   The University of Arizona

   Vice Provost, Undergraduate Education
   Professor, Electrical & Computer Engineering
   University of Arizona, Tucson

3. Prof. Joaquin Carbonara

   SUNY Buffalo State University

   Professor of Mathematics
   Lead Faculty, Data Science and Analytics M.S.
   SUNY Buffalo State University, Buffalo

4. Dr. Anuja Kamat

   Wentworth Institute of Technology

   Associate Dean, School of Engineering
   Wentworth Institute of Technology

Session Description

Peer review is a process many of us have engaged in, whether through ASEE or other professional publishing opportunities, both as author and reviewer. Though it is a common part of our academic lives, it is not something that is often taught - there is no Peer Reviewing 101. This interactive panel will give attendees a chance to think critically about the function of peer review, engage with examples of both positive and negative peer review experiences, and thoughtfully discuss ways to improve our own understanding of peer review and methods for conducting peer review well.

Our primary audien ... (continued)

Moderated by

1. Ms. Kari Kozak and Lynsey Eames

Speakers

1. Ms. Kelly Durkin Ruth

   United States Naval Academy

   Kelly Durkin Ruth is the engineering librarian at the United States Naval Academy in Annapolis, MD. Her undergraduate degree and work experience in journalism informs her approach to writing and editing for various audiences. She’s also served as a peer reviewer for conferences, a journal and an edited book, and she has experience undergoing peer review as an author.

2. Elizabeth Carpenter

   University at Buffalo, The State University of New York

   Beth Carpenter is the Undergraduate Engineering and Instruction Librarian at the University at Buffalo. With an undergraduate background in English and an editor for a father, peer review is actually an enjoyable activity for her. She’s served as a peer reviewer for conferences and library publications, including journals and lesson plans, and has been peer reviewed as an author. How to help the peer review process improve is something she thinks about a lot.

3. Dr. Sarah Over

   Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University

   Dr. Sarah Over is the libraries’ liaison for engineering, patents and trademarks at Virginia Tech, and also a research analyst supporting the College of Engineering and Office of Research and Innovation. Dr. Over’s background is in aerospace and nuclear engineering, with years of experience teaching engineering research methods and introductory coding. She also has extensive experience in peer review including serving as ELD’s Publications Chair, overseeing the development of a new rubric for ELD, and serving as a NASA proposal reviewer.

Session Description

This panel will explore the critical role of industry connections and collaborations in enhancing the preparedness of engineering management students for their future careers. Panelists from both academia and industry will discuss how integrating real-world projects, mentorship, and industry-driven insights into academic programs equips students with practical skills and experiences while highlighting how these partnerships provide mutual benefits, enabling industry partners to access fresh talent, innovative solutions, and emerging perspectives.

Session Description

ET National Forum

Moderated by

1. Dr. David L. Ferro and Dr. Vassilios Tzouanas

Session Description

The panel will introduce the audience to the Lemelson Foundation Engineering for One Planet (EOP) initiative Mini-Grant Program (MGP). For the past three years, the EOP-MGP has brought teams of engineering educators together to develop curricula in engineering that puts sustainability at the core of engineering principles including design, manufacture, and scalability. Teams meet regularly with mentors who share their experience implementing sustainability into campus curricula and navigating the challenges of transforming engineering education at its core. The goal of the EOP-MGP is not only to ... (continued)

For those interested in: Broadening Participation in Engineering and Engineering Technology

Session Description

The purpose of this panel session is to initiate a thoughtful and open dialogue within the
engineering education community about the unique experiences, challenges,
opportunities, and needs of regional campus settings. Specifically, this panel session aims
to (1) inform attendees about the regional campus engineering space and (2) bring regional
campus engineering programs into the conversation so that we can better understand
what support they need to promote student success and successfully retain students
through graduation.

This session will be formatted primarily as a discussion wit ... (continued)

For those interested in: Broadening Participation in Engineering and Engineering Technology and Pre-College

Speakers

1. Sherri Youssef

   The Ohio State University

   TBD

2. Dr. Rachel Louis Kajfez

   The Ohio State University

   TBD

3. Miss Amanda Marie Singer

   The Ohio State University

   TBD

Session Description

This session focuses on the intersection of education, career development, and real-world applications. Papers explore preparing Industrial Engineering (IE) graduates to train workers on new procedures following system improvements, how required courses influence career thinking among IE students, and a sensor-based study on urban walkability and pedestrian stress across different sites. These studies highlight the critical connection between education and real-world challenges in training, career paths, and urban system design.

For those interested in: Academia-Industry Connections, Advocacy and Policy, Broadening Participation in Engineering and Engineering Technology, New Members, and Pre-College

Papers Presented

1. Examining How Required Courses Shape Industrial Engineering Students’ Career Thinking [view paper]
   Hayley N. Nielsen (University of Michigan), Vibhavari Vempala (University of Michigan), Berenice Alejandra Cabrera (University of Michigan), Dr. Lisa R. Lattuca (University of Michigan), Dr. Erika Mosyjowski (University of Michigan), Dr. Joi-Lynn Mondisa (University of Michigan), and Dr. Shanna R. Daly (University of Michigan)

Session Description

Join colleagues to discuss the division's activities of the past year and plans for the upcoming year. Elections are not held this year with all offices in the middle of two-year terms. All who are interested in Instrumentation as it applies to engineering education are welcome to join the discussion.

For those interested in: Academia-Industry Connections and New Members

Moderated by

1. Dr. Pritpal "Pali" Singh

Session Description

Where within the engineering curriculum do students see the sociocultural relevance of the engineering concepts and principles they are learning? At present in engineering education, most problems in engineering textbooks are decontextualized. Decontextualized problems generally include basic features: given X, find Y, idealistic assumptions about the physical world (e.g., frictionless planes, incompressible fluids), and math and science as the only frameworks available to solve the problem. Decontextualized problems deprive students of the important ways in which the sociocultural context surrou ... (continued)

Moderated by

1. Dr. Jon A. Leydens, Dr. Diana A. Chen, and Dr. Juan C. Lucena

Papers Presented

1. Bridging the Gap: Integrating Entrepreneurial Thinking and New Product Development into Manufacturing Education [view paper]
   Dr. Gimantha N Perera (University of Arizona), Hannah Budinoff (The University of Arizona), and DAVID MANFORD (The University of Arizona)
2. Integrating Sustainable Practices into Lean Engineering: Applying the Engineering for One Planet Framework in Manufacturing Engineering Technology Education [view paper]
   Dr. Dalya Ismael (Old Dominion University), Dr. Vukica M. Jovanovic (Old Dominion University), Dr. Murat Kuzlu (Old Dominion University), Charles Lowe (Old Dominion University), and Dr. Lisa Bosman (Purdue University)
3. Analysis of User Experience in Digital Reality: A Comparative Study of VR and MR for Manufacturing Training [view paper]
   Ms. Israa Azzam (Purdue University at West Lafayette), Khalid Bello (University of Louisville), Dr. Farid Breidi (Purdue University at West Lafayette (PPI)), and Dr. Faisal Aqlan (University of Louisville)
4. Providing a Comprehensive Learning Experience in Applying Reverse Engineering Techniques and CAD for Redesign, Simulation, and Manufacturing of Diverse Drone Platforms [view paper]
   Dr. Akbar M. Eslami (ELIZABETH CITY STATE UNIV), Dr. Chandra Bhushan Asthana P.E. (Elizabeth City State University), and Dr. Kuldeep S Rawat (Elizabeth City State University)