This full paper introduces a custom-developed protocol and process to document and create consensus between graduate students and their faculty advisors during critical points of contention. Stemming from an NSF-funded work, early-stage exploratory study aimed to improve representation and support for Black Ph.D.s in engineering (target population for the project), the authors noted a lack of protocols and processes by which participatory action design research can be used to document and create consensus between a faculty advisor (FA) and their graduate student (GS). To minimize harm to the target population, which already is severely underserved and marginalized in engineering, the authors opted to test this protocol and process amongst themselves and document its outcomes. The research design was participatory research with a collaborative autoethnographic approach to systematically, iteratively, and critically incorporate the knowledge, expertise, experience, propositions, and practices to deepen the experiences of the participants and researchers. This paper specifically focused on the process of developing the protocol. For this, open coding was conducted, and salient topics identified the need to uncover the: (1) hidden expectations about mentoring roles and responsibilities; (2) the need to explore unintended impacts of coercion in the process of research; and (3) the need to explore past, mentoring traumas before starting in a mentoring relationship. To engage in critical conversations and to deeply explore mentoring relationships, procedures must simultaneously situate the perspectives, experiences, and lived realities of both the faculty advisor and the graduate students. This process development hopefully can serve to uncover areas that colleges of engineering and universities can attend to when seeking to sustainably and impactfully support unresolved or poorly managed conflicts between faculty advisors and their graduate students in mentoring relationships. The paper concludes with recommendations and implications.
The full paper will be available to logged in and registered conference attendees once the conference starts on June 22, 2025, and to all visitors after the conference ends on June 25, 2025