This research brief describes an empirical study examining belonging from an identity perspective for Transgender and Gender Non-Conforming (TGNC) undergraduate engineering students. Documented gender disparities in engineering often rely on the gender binary to describe differences. TGNC students break the molds of binary gender expression and identity, which requires new approaches to understanding these students’ experiences. Existing research on the LGBTQIA+ community in engineering focuses on sexuality as separate from gender identity. However, both contribute to belonging differences, particularly for TGNC students who are queer in both their gender identity and sexual orientation.
At a Large Public Midwestern primarily white institution (PWI), we conducted a 40-minute belonging intervention. Three TGNC students participated in the optional interviews that followed. We conducted two coding passes of transcribed interviews: 1) descriptive codes and 2) pattern coding based on the first pass codes and the theoretical frameworks: Identity Negotiation Theory (INT) and LGBTQIA+ Identity Development Models (IDM). INT details the negotiation of personal and membership identity, while IDM contextualizes the participant experiences with the other developmental steps they experience in college as TGNC individuals, such as feeling comfortable in their gender expression.
Based on INT and IDM we propose individual queer engineering identity is developed within three distinct layers of the engineering system—their peers, their educational experiences (classes, internships, co-ops, seminars, etc.), and their beliefs about their future in the field. We found that TGNC students feel constrained in their genderqueer identities and have no models of what agency would be for them in engineering. Therefore, they feel decreased hope for their futures despite interest and ability in engineering. Peers are the first step of this negotiation for belonging, yet TGNC students struggle to feel seen as both engineers and genderqueer individuals. The lack of validation and acceptance both disrupts and expedites certain identity development steps, such as disclosing their identity to their peers and experiencing resistance on account of their identities. While this research brief only concerns the negotiation of TGNC students with their peers, the results indicate that students feel both a lack of belonging and an active deterrence in persisting in engineering because of their queer identities.
Keywords: Transgender and gender non-conforming, sexual orientation, persistence
The full paper will be available to logged in and registered conference attendees once the conference starts on June 22, 2025, and to all visitors after the conference ends on June 25, 2025