Graduate students often enter engineering education (EED) from varied backgrounds and with diverse motivations, but little research has explored how personality and identity shape these pathways. While prior work has examined graduate student identity development in engineering and education broadly, few studies capture how cohorts themselves reflect on and make meaning of their entry into EED. Understanding these perspectives is essential for both supporting graduate student development and strengthening the field's inclusivity.
This paper presents a collaborative inquiry (CI) conducted by 17 EED graduate students. We engaged in a reflective process using the Color Code Personality Assessment, developed by Dr. Hartman, as a lens to explore how our individual traits influence our academic choices, career trajectories, research interests, and collaborative experiences. Unlike traditional research approaches, in which participants are solely subjects of analysis, CI positions all members as both participants and co-authors, ensuring that each voice contributes equally to meaning-making and dissemination.
Data collection followed a structured reflection protocol. First, each participant completed the personality assessment and wrote responses to guided prompts, including: 1) How do you see your personality traits shaping your pathway into engineering education and your goals within the field? 2) What aspects of your color results resonated with you, and what aspects surprised you? 3) In what ways do colleagues, mentors, or peers perceive your personality, and how does this align with your own self-perception? 4) How do you see personality dynamics within our cohort contributing to collaboration, community, and identity development in engineering education? Participants simultaneously reflected on how personality differences contribute to collaboration and community within the cohort. Reflections were then analyzed asynchronously by each participant and discussed as a whole cohort, culminating in a collective synthesis of emerging themes.
Our analysis highlights how personality traits both support and complicate pathways into EED. For some, characteristics such as adaptability or empathy helped explain persistent interests in teaching, mentoring, or equity-driven research. For others, reflections revealed tensions between self-identified traits and external perceptions, which shaped how they navigated collaboration and belonging within the department. The cohort also identified personality diversity as an asset, noting that differences enhance teamwork, broaden perspectives, and shape identity within the discipline. Rather than positioning personality as a causal factor, participants used these frameworks as a shared language to interpret motivations, navigate interpersonal dynamics, and make sense of identity development and belonging within their graduate cohort.
The full paper will be available to logged in and registered conference attendees once the conference starts on June 21, 2026, and to all visitors after the conference ends on June 24, 2026