2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Critical Analyses of the Experiences and Perspectives of Multiply-Marginalized Undergraduate Engineering Students

This full critical theory paper describes the results of a study designed to identify barriers encountered by undergraduate students experiencing cultural and structural marginalization in a prestigious engineering program. Existing research has identified many hindered academic outcomes experienced by undergraduate engineering students with marginalized social identities, including in this engineering college. This work aims to identify and investigate factors that are impeding their success using qualitative research methodologies. A team of researchers in the Midwestern United States designed a series of events, called the [program name redacted], with engineering students at a highly selective research institution. The student participants were all multiply-marginalized, which we define as meeting at least two of the following criteria: not white, not a man, not heterosexual, and working class (which we define as an annual family income less than $100,000 per year). Our data collection, research, and facilitation methods were designed to build toward collective empowerment, guided by liberative, or anti-oppressive, theories, frameworks, and practices.

The [program name redacted] program paid participants to participate in four events over the course of an academic year. The central activity of the first [program name redacted] event was focus groups with collaborative, facilitated conversations on the topics of belonging, recruitment and outreach, institutional diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts, the classroom environment, mentoring, and conflict resolution. Participants were free to join the focus groups on topics that were of most interest to them. The focus groups were facilitated by graduate students trained by the project, and other graduate students provided note-taking services. Member-checking was employed on the notes later during the data analysis phase. The event concluded with a full-group visioning activity, in which the students were invited to build a collective vision of their desired experience in engineering education.

The results of the study offer insights into the common experiences of the participants from their collective point of view. Thematic analysis of the qualitative data highlighted four barriers to multiply-marginalized students’ successes within the engineering college: the impacts of their working class backgrounds, the poor mental health they were frequently experiencing, the “minority tax'' imposed on them, and tokenizing practices within the engineering college. By design, the event enabled participants to build collective understanding, empathy, and action across these overlapping experiences. This work provided an opportunity for the growth of critical consciousness in the participants as well as the facilitators, and the [program name redacted] also resulted in the initiation of tangible organizing efforts to construct just systems and realities for marginalized students in engineering. The results of this study identify problems that must be addressed by engineering programs hoping to serve diverse students. However, the study also offers insight into potential approaches for power-building amongst marginalized students, who are the best experts in their own experiences.

Authors
  1. Dr. Corin L. Bowen Orcid 16x16http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0910-8902 California State University, Los Angeles [biography]
  2. Joseph Valle Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE) [biography]
Note

The full paper will be available to logged in and registered conference attendees once the conference starts on June 22, 2025, and to all visitors after the conference ends on June 25, 2025