The purpose of this WIP research is to examine the intersectionality of traditionally examined broadening participation in engineering demographics (i.e., race, socio-economic status) with post-traditional student status and categories. Engineering education has been historically exclusive to racial group such as Black and Latinx students, and lower socioeconomic status students. While broadening participation often focuses on cultural marginalization of these student groups, there are other broader structural issues and life circumstances that affect their educational access and outcomes. In general, and in this study, we aim to further establish how Black, Latinx, and lower socioeconomic status students are more likely to study part-time, be older, be a parent, and support others while attending school—in short, they are more likely to be “post-traditional” students. While higher education literature has interrogated these post-traditional student categories more thoroughly, engineering education has done less to establish and interrogate this intersection.
More specifically, in this study, we focus on 1) classifying post-traditional students in terms of categories and extents of post-traditional status, 2) examine the intersectionality of the post-traditional population with other historically excluded demographic groups, and 3) assess the educational access and outcomes for this intersectional and underserved population. We draw on intersectionality theory and Choy’s (2022) post-traditional student status classifications to operationalize the analytical categories and procedures for our quantitative study. We utilize the de-identified institutional data from undergraduate engineering students enrolled during the 2023-2024 academic year at a large Hispanic-Serving Institution in the Southeastern United States and employ descriptive statistics, mean difference tests, and linear and logistic regressions to address our research purposes.
Our key findings include:
1) Among all part-time students, 87% are from historically excluded groups (HEG) by race. Similarly, 85% of students with children and 81% of female students belong to HEGs. All students who have dependents are HEGs;
2) Students classified as highly post-traditional (who have four post-traditional characteristics) have an average GPA of 2.89, compared to 3.06 for minimally post-traditional students (who have one post-traditional characteristic)
3) For students classified as minimally post-traditional (who have only one post-traditional characteristics), 18% graduate within four years have the characteristic of starting college at 25 years or above, while 13% have the characteristic of being part-time students.
By examining the impact of different variables, this study will contribute to a deeper understanding of the challenges and opportunities faced by this diverse student population. Understanding these challenges is not only crucial for enhancing student success but also for promoting educational equity in engineering. By recognizing the unique needs and experiences of post-traditional students, we can develop more inclusive policies and support systems that ensure all students have the opportunity to succeed, regardless of their educational or life trajectories.
The full paper will be available to logged in and registered conference attendees once the conference starts on June 22, 2025, and to all visitors after the conference ends on June 25, 2025