2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Board 281: Fidelity and Transferability of an Ecological Intervention to Transform Engineering Representation at Scale

Presented at NSF Grantees Poster Session

We report on an ongoing effort to contextualize and test an ecological belonging intervention in first- and second-year engineering courses. As a part of an NSF IUSE: EDU Program, Institutional, and Community Transformation track grant, this intervention targets women, Black, Latinx, and Indigenous students to support self-efficacy, belongingness, growth mindset, and identity as avenues to address academic equity gaps that persist in engineering despite increasing enrollment within engineering among these groups. We frame these equity gaps because they exist not from any deficit of the students themselves but rather systemic issues of marginalization that make students feel as if they do not belong. The ecological belonging intervention focuses on common engineering course-specific student experiences of struggle and is delivered by instructors early in the term. Through shared narratives and self-reflection students learn that struggle in engineering courses is normal and surmountable. Our prior work indicates that this message may serve as a protective mechanism for Black, Latinx, and Indigenous students’ belonging and, subsequently, individual grades in their courses. As we continue to develop and study the intervention, we share our processes and additional findings in the proposed paper. First, we report on our initial efforts to assess fidelity in implementation of the intervention by course instructors and the impact of the intervention on instructors. Second, we report on our continued research on the efficacy of the intervention on student outcomes.

We hypothesize that the intervention is most effective when instructors follow the intervention protocol, share their stories of struggle authentically, and effectively facilitate small group discussions. We created an observation protocol to help assess the fidelity of intervention implementation in classroom settings. Graduate student research team members observed seven classes in which the instructors conducted the intervention. The observation protocol consisted of 15 quantitative items such as "facilitator shares a personal story" that observers rated on a 3-point scale: "did not observe," "needs improvement," and "accomplished well." Qualitative questions (n = 13) assessed additional aspects such as notes on the instructor-facilitator's body language. Qualitative interviews with instructors have also provided insight into faculty perspectives on intervention fidelity. With this data, we investigate how onboarding to the intervention impacts instructor beliefs, how instructor beliefs shape implementation, and the impact of facilitating the intervention on instructors' mindsets, attitudes, and practices. Further, the research team is using this information to improve facilitator training (e.g., ensuring implementers perform essential intervention tasks) and to check the observation protocol captures all of the essential observation aspects (clarifying what "adequate engagement" means).

Our research on the efficacy of the intervention on student outcomes continues across two lines. In the first, we seek to identify short-term impacts on course grades (i.e., individual work, final grade) and continued enrollment in engineering courses. Initial analyses have found limited direct impact on course grades, with more impact on individual assignment grades and continued enrollment. The second line seeks to identify the relationships between theoretically important psychosocial constructs such as belongingness, self-efficacy, fascination, and engineering identity in preparation for future longitudinal assessments of change following the intervention.

Authors
  1. Charlie Díaz University of Pittsburgh [biography]
  2. Erica McGreevy University of Pittsburgh [biography]
  3. Nelson O. O. Zounlomè University of Pittsburgh [biography]
  4. Anne-Ketura Elie University of Pittsburgh [biography]
  5. Maricela Bañuelos University of California, Irvine [biography]
  6. Dr. Christian D Schunn University of Pittsburgh [biography]
  7. Beverly Conrique University of Pittsburgh [biography]
  8. Liwei Chen University of Pittsburgh
  9. Carlie Laton Cooper University of Georgia [biography]
  10. Rachel Kelly Forster University of Pittsburgh
  11. Dr. Jacqueline Rohde Georgia Institute of Technology [biography]
Download paper (1.82 MB)

Are you a researcher? Would you like to cite this paper? Visit the ASEE document repository at peer.asee.org for more tools and easy citations.