2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Development of a Diagnostic Tool to Identify Graduate Students' Self-Determined Communication

Presented at GSD 2: Identity and Motivation

Effective communication is essential for the professional development and preparation of graduate engineering students, yet existing instruments do not adequately define and assess how students develop autonomy, competence, and relatedness in academic discourse. Grounded in Self-Determination Theory (SDT), this study presents the Communication & Facilitation of Learning in Oral & Written Scholarship (COMM-FLOWS) diagnostic tool, a novel instrument designed to identify self-determined communication in graduate education. This research addresses two key questions: (1) How do the adaptation steps contribute to the theoretical and practical development of the COMM-FLOWS tool? (2) In what ways do the measures of the COMM-FLOWS tool differ from those of the original Basic Psychological Needs Satisfaction – General (BPNS-G) scale in capturing self-determined communication in graduate education?

Using an adaptation framework informed by Chenel et al. (2018)’s decision-aid methodology, this study modifies the BPNS-G scale to capture the nuances of oral and written communication in an academic setting. The adaptation process involved seven structured steps: (1) identifying a scale for adaptation, (2) appraising the original scale, (3) understanding the context of graduate student communication, (4) adapting and developing items, (5) aligning items with SDT and graduate student experiences, (6) validating content and testing usability, and (7) preparing the tool for deployment. These steps ensured that the COMM-FLOWS tool remained both theoretically grounded and practically relevant for assessing how engineering graduate students navigate advisor-student and peer-peer interactions, scholarly writing, and professional presentations.

This study makes two novel contributions to graduate engineering education. First, it introduces a decision-aid approach to communication assessment by transforming COMM-FLOWS from a static diagnostic instrument into an active component of an interactive framework designed to support advisor-student dialogue and individual self-reflection. Second, it advances self-determination theory in engineering education by extending SDT constructs beyond research motivation to the development of communication necessary for academic and professional success. Pilot testing indicated that participants completed the 76-item tool within 20 minutes, with feedback confirming its engagement, clarity, and relevance.

The findings have significant implications for graduate advising, curriculum design, and professional development programs in engineering education. By embedding COMM-FLOWS into advisor training, communication workshops, and peer mentoring, institutions can foster more autonomous, competent, and connected communicators—ultimately enhancing students’ preparedness for academic and industry careers. Future research should explore the tool’s broader applicability across disciplines and its potential to improve advisor-student communication, research productivity, and graduate student well-being.

Authors
  1. Miss Ifeoma Mary Nwanua University of Florida [biography]
  2. Jasmine E. McNealy University of Florida [biography]
Note

The full paper will be available to logged in and registered conference attendees once the conference starts on June 22, 2025, and to all visitors after the conference ends on June 25, 2025

« View session

For those interested in:

  • engineering
  • Faculty
  • Graduate