Appreciative Inquiry (APPI) is an asset-based research approach that has been used in a range of domains, including organizational development, public health, and education, to study and facilitate social change in organizations and communities. APPI is grounded in social constructivist theory, which suggests that our perceptions of reality are socially constructed, and that by focusing on positive stories and experiences, particularly from people whose identities are marginalized, we can create a more positive reality in work and learning environments. Despite its prominence for more than two decades, it is not known to what extent APPI has been used in engineering education research. Further, there is limited to no evidence of utilizing APPI as an educational intervention.
As a part of an early-stage research project on evaluating the impact of asset-based practices in undergraduate engineering courses, we employed appreciative interviewing to elicit student experiences in applying their assets to projects and other learning activities in engineering courses. In recruiting interview participants, we strategically oversampled for marginalized racial/ethnic and gender identities to ensure diverse perspectives. During the interview process, we observed that student participants reflected on their strengths and connected them to their work in and beyond engineering courses, suggesting the potential of APPI to be used both as an asset-based pedagogical intervention and as a research method for collaborative sense-making with students about their experiences. We believe that students were better able to recognize and activate their assets because of APPI’s roots in social constructivism, which enable participants to engage in collective inquiry and dialogue to reveal inherent, diverse strengths that may not be readily apparent in engineering contexts. Based on this observation, we sought to answer the following two questions: (1) In what contexts has APPI been applied as a methodology in engineering education research and how can it be extended to study as equity-centered practices? and (2) How can APPI be employed as an educational or pedagogical intervention to value and activate student assets in engineering and engineering design courses and what lessons can be learned from the process? To address these questions, we will leverage data from and our experiences with appreciative interviews (n = 10 student participants) as well as a critical review of literature related to APPI. We anticipate that this work will contribute to rigor and equity in designing studies using APPI as a methodology, while also demonstrating the application of APPI as an educational intervention.
Are you a researcher? Would you like to cite this paper? Visit the ASEE document repository at peer.asee.org for more tools and easy citations.