One of the future challenges facing academic disciplines—traditional STEM as well as the social sciences and humanities—is how to prepare students to address complex socio-technical problems that require a range of disciplinary perspectives to address. The National Science Foundation RED project at Bucknell University is focused on enabling students to gain a more intersectional engineering education by expanding individual pathways for students through an electrical and computer engineering degree program. Towards this end the department undertook significant curricular reform prior from 2014 to 2017 to seeking support from the RED program in 2019.
While there has been much discussion of student pathways, the concept is likely under-theorized; that is scholars have difficulty coherently and concisely defining it, and it lacks a commonly agreed upon framework. To better align the difficult work needed to expand student pathways through a curriculum in the highly constrained structure of most engineering degree programs, the Bucknell RED project utilizes the capabilities approach as a theoretical framework. In the capability approach the freedom for individuals to develop capabilities they value is viewed as both the means and end of development. Individuals convert their capabilities—which are real and accessible opportunities—into functionings they have reason to value. Functionings are societally recognized achievements that have real value. The capability approach is used across many disciplines in areas of human development. In the space of engineering education, the capabilities approach shifts the discussion from educational outcomes as the sole goal to additionally include opportunities (capabilities) and achievements (functionings).
This poster presents the results and process by which the capabilities approach framework was specifically adapted for an engineering degree program to create a list of student capabilities. Capabilities are identified at multiple levels, from general human capabilities to those specific to engineering students. The ways the capabilities intersect with the rest of the curriculum is highlighted as are how the capabilities approach can be used to highlight barriers to pursuing a wider array of curricular pathways.
Are you a researcher? Would you like to cite this paper? Visit the ASEE document repository at peer.asee.org for more tools and easy citations.