Before generative AI reshaped the educational landscape, a course was designed around a simple premise: understand AI before you use it. This paper examines that intuition-first approach through Foundations of Data Science and Machine Learning, originally developed and taught in 2020 and offered again in 2025 using the same conceptual curriculum. Students engaged with foundational AI concepts by hand, without code or libraries. Using a concept-focused written assessment and final project reports from the 2025 offering, we analyze how students reason about model assumptions, evaluation tradeoffs, and failure modes. Results show consistent evidence of conceptual reasoning, including the ability
to articulate why models fail and what probabilistic systems cannot know. These forms of reasoning align with the critical thinking that generative AI literacy requires, despite generative AI systems never being explicitly taught. This case also illustrates how institutional constraints on AI coursework can narrow interdisciplinary access while conceptual depth remains intact. The findings suggest that intuition-first instruction provides a durable foundation for AI literacy that remains relevant as tools evolve.
http://orcid.org/https://0000-0001-7272-0507
Texas A&M University
[biography]
Are you a researcher? Would you like to cite this paper? Visit the ASEE document repository at peer.asee.org for more tools and easy citations.