Neurodivergent people bring valuable strengths such as creativity, analytical acuity, and spatial abilities to engineering, yet they leave engineering programs at higher rates than their neurotypical peers. This attrition has contributed to the overall underrepresentation of neurodivergent engineers in the STEM workforce and may be attributed to several systemic and sociocultural factors including poor academic support and pervasive narratives that frame neurodivergence as a deficit rather than a difference. Guided by a social constructionist framework, this three-year mixed methods study examines how neurodivergent engineering students understand, describe, and leverage their strengths and challenges while navigating undergraduate engineering programs. Stage 1 (QUANT) used Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) to analyze neurodivergent discourse on social media, while Stage 2 (QUAL) involves longitudinal interviews conducted with neurodivergent undergraduate engineering students at a four-year university in the western United States and cross-sectional interviews conducted with neurodivergent undergraduate engineering students nationwide. In this paper, we highlight the initial findings from a series of longitudinal interviews conducted at a single university with Via (pseudonym), a current undergraduate engineering student, and Tom (pseudonym), a recent graduate of an undergraduate engineering program. Our findings underscore the importance of community, suggesting that fostering community is not a peripheral support strategy but a core component of inclusive engineering education.
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5288-8345
Minnesota State University, Mankato
[biography]
The full paper will be available to logged in and registered conference attendees once the conference starts on June 21, 2026, and to all visitors after the conference ends on June 24, 2026