This empirical full paper examines the differences in situational engagement among students with low and high levels of need for cognitive closure (NFCC) during problem-solving activities. Problem-solving in engineering requires not only conceptual understanding but also sustained cognitive engagement when tackling challenging tasks. Individual differences in motivational dispositions, such as NFCC, may influence students’ ability to maintain attention, manage uncertainty, and remain engaged during complex problem-solving activities. This study is guided by one major research question: How does the need for cognitive closure impact students’ situational engagement, including their skill, interest, and perceived challenge during problem-solving activity?
To investigate the impact of NFCC on situational engagement during problem solving, the researchers adopted a sequential mixed-method approach. In the first phase, they collected quantitative data from engineering students at a land grant public university in the western United States using a validated NFCC survey. A total of 103 undergraduate engineering students participated during the first phase of data collection. Based on survey responses, two distinct NFCC groups (high and low) were identified, and eight students were purposefully selected for in-depth qualitative analysis. During the qualitative phase, each participant completed a complex engineering problem. The situational engagement questionnaire was used to measure their skill, interest, and perceived challenge at four time points. Participants were also interviewed with the same situational engagement questionnaire to understand the problem-solvers’ subjective cognitive engagement experiences after the problem-solving activity.
Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. Situational engagement data were further analyzed to examine group differences and identify patterns across NFCC levels. Qualitative responses from the post-problem interviews were coded thematically to identify engagement patterns and cognitive alignment. The comparative analysis of quantitative trends and qualitative narratives revealed that high-NFCC participants tended to maintain consistent engagement when task structure was clear, whereas low-NFCC participants demonstrated more adaptive engagement during the emergence of ambiguity or uncertainty.
Findings highlight the importance of incorporating individual difference variables with real-time engagement measures to design adaptive instructions in engineering education. These findings contribute to a better understanding of the cognitive-motivational mechanisms underlying engineering problem solving. The findings also imply that recognizing and responding to students’ differing levels of NFCC can help instructors design adaptive problem-solving environments and enhance learning outcomes in engineering education.
http://orcid.org/https://0000-0002-8060-7384
Ohio State Department of Education
[biography]
The full paper will be available to logged in and registered conference attendees once the conference starts on June 21, 2026, and to all visitors after the conference ends on June 24, 2026