2026 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Exploring Gendered Pathways: The Role of Formative Assessment in Enhancing Cognitive Engagement in Undergraduate Engineering

Presented at A Deep Dive into Failure and Assessment

This study is a theory and methods full research paper that examines gender differences in learning approaches and engagement in engineering education. Gender differences in learning approaches and engagement have long been a subject of interest in engineering education research and have been widely studied. Since one of the fundamental objectives for educators is to design fair, equitable, and effective learning experiences for all students, an understanding of how male and female undergraduate engineering students react to various types of learning experiences and assessments can help contribute to these efforts. This study explores how formative assessments influence cognitive engagement during problem-solving activities among first-year undergraduate engineering students with particular attention to gender differences. Considering the growing need to account for individual differences in educational settings, this research focuses on how male and female students demonstrate distinct patterns of cognitive engagement when exposed to formative assessments during problem-solving tasks. This research is part of a larger study that utilizes a sequential exploratory mixed-method design with a participant selection model. The quantitative phase employed the Need for Closure Scale (NFCS) and demographic data from 67 students enrolled in an engineering mechanics statics course at a public land-grant research university in the western United States to identify eight participants (4 males, 4 females) for the qualitative phase of the study. In the qualitative phase, the selected participants solved two statics problems of equal difficulty, with formative assessment integrated into only one task. Using the guided Think-Aloud Protocol (TAP), students’ verbalizations of their reasoning, reflections, and decision-making were recorded. The resulting qualitative data were analyzed through the ICAP framework to examine gender-based patterns of cognitive engagement and how these patterns shifted with the introduction of formative assessments during problem-solving. The findings indicated that formative assessments enhanced cognitive engagement both among males and females, but in different ways. Females were found to show improvement in reflective thinking and receptivity to feedback after the introduction of formative assessments. Male students, on the other hand, showed increases in task focus, persistence of task focus, and less modification of strategy. The findings indicate the necessity for the reframing of formative assessments and feedback, and an assessment design to incorporate gender-based differential needs of undergraduate engineering students.

Authors
  1. Dr. Talha Naqash Dickinson State University [biography]
  2. Dr. Zain ul Abideen Utah State University [biography]
  3. Dr. Oenardi Lawanto Utah State University [biography]
Note

The full paper will be available to logged in and registered conference attendees once the conference starts on June 21, 2026, and to all visitors after the conference ends on June 24, 2026