2026 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Exploring Peer-to-Peer Evaluation with an AI-Supported Learning Tool in an Introductory Programming Course: An MSI Case Study

Presented at Computers in Education (CoED): AI in Education (5 of 9) -- T408C

With the growing prevalence of generative artificial intelligence and its capacity to instantly generate computational coding solutions through large language model-based queries, concerns have emerged among educators regarding the potential attrition of students’ critical thinking and analytical problem-solving abilities. Existing education literature indicates that peer-to-peer evaluation can function as a pedagogical intervention to promote deeper learning and improve programming performance, particularly among novice programmers. These interventions provide opportunities for students to engage in delivering and receiving constructive feedback, thereby fostering communication skills, reflective thinking, and reinforcement of conceptual understanding in programming contexts. Even in the age of artificial intelligence, new tools are being developed to facilitate peer-to-peer evaluation and support collaborative learning among students.

To further investigate the impact of peer-to-peer evaluation on novice programmers, a case study was conducted in an introductory programming course at a minority-serving institution in the Mid-Atlantic United States during the Fall 2024 semester. The course integrated Kritik360, a commercial-based and AI-supported peer assessment platform, to examine the influence of structured group discussions implemented as weekly learning activities among Information Systems majors in this introductory programming course.

Kritik360 is designed to foster student engagement and promote the development of critical thinking and evaluative skills as students engage with course content through collaborative learning tasks. The primary objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness of Kritik360 in enabling students to engage in peer-to-peer evaluation within assigned groups as they develop foundational computational thinking skills and understanding core data structures in Java programming. To evaluate the impact of Kritik360 on students’ learning experiences, a survey was administered consisting of questions designed to collect both quantitative and qualitative data regarding students’ perceptions and interactions with the tool. A total of 31 students completed the survey.

The findings indicated that students held moderately positive perceptions of Kritik360’s effectiveness in enhancing their evaluative skills. Additionally, the tool was perceived as beneficial for supporting programming and code comprehension practices. However, when asked about potential areas for improvement, students noted certain aspects of Kritik360’s usability and feature capacity that could be further refined to better support the learning process.

Authors
  1. Edward Dillon University of Maryland Baltimore County [biography]
  2. Carine Marette Indiana University-Bloomington [biography]
  3. Ben Cohen University of Maryland Baltimore County
  4. Omobolanle Niyi Owoeye University of Maryland Baltimore County
  5. Kevin Lemus University of Maryland Baltimore County [biography]
  6. SRUSHTI RAJESH DHARMALE University of Maryland Baltimore County
Download paper (333 KB)

Are you a researcher? Would you like to cite this paper? Visit the ASEE document repository at peer.asee.org for more tools and easy citations.