Senior capstone courses are built to be the culminating experience in a computing degree, yet their project-focused structure rarely asks students to look back across the curriculum they are about to leave behind. This study examines a simple response to that gap: short, low-stakes daily quizzes integrated into a senior computing capstone course, prompting retrieval of foundational concepts spanning algorithms, data structures, operating systems, software engineering, and professional practice, running alongside project work rather than replacing it.
Drawing on qualitative content analysis of 148 coded student responses across multiple semesters, and grounded in Retrieval Practice Theory, Formative Assessment Theory, and Cognitive Load Theory, this study finds that students experienced the quizzes as surfacing forgotten material, normalizing shared knowledge gaps among peers, and building the confidence and articulation needed for professional practice. Students also identified clear design conditions under which the intervention worked best, including immediate feedback and content transparency. Rather than measuring causal learning gains, this study contributes practice-based evidence illustrating how retrieval-based formative assessment can complement project-based learning in advanced computing courses. The findings offer actionable guidance for educators seeking to strengthen disciplinary coherence and workforce readiness, and raise timely questions about retrieval fluency in an era where generative AI can surface facts on demand but cannot substitute for the judgment to evaluate them.
http://orcid.org/https://0000-0001-7272-0507
Texas A&M University
[biography]
Are you a researcher? Would you like to cite this paper? Visit the ASEE document repository at peer.asee.org for more tools and easy citations.