We have investigated changes in elementary teachers’ engineering self-efficacy as they participated in an ongoing online professional learning (PL) program. The research team, along with expert PL providers, designed this program to give teachers a foundational understanding of A Framework for K-12 Science Education and the Next Generation Science Standards. These documents collectively call for engineering education that begins in elementary school. However, prior research shows that teachers report lower self-efficacy in engineering than in other subjects (e.g., math). Teachers’ engineering self-efficacy has been linked to their willingness to integrate subject-specific content in classrooms. Because teachers' self-efficacy may be influenced by content and pedagogical knowledge, and other variables, a plan of action was adopted that combined PL with modest supports. For this study the research team recruited elementary teachers from four states (CA, MT, ND, and WY). Individuals who taught in rural schools in each of these states were encouraged to join a year-long program, and this study includes participants who started in 2023 (n=75) and 2024 (n=2024). All participating teachers received intensive summer PL, delivered online with synchronous and asynchronous components. The online PL modeled shifts called for by NGSS and offered guidance for teachers as they introduced engineering practices into their classrooms. Then, during the following school year, teachers stayed connected as an online professional learning community and remained engaged in PL activities. Likert-scale surveys were administered electronically before and immediately after the summer PL, along with a delayed post-PL survey at the end of the school year. These surveys included scales of the Teacher Efficacy and Attitudes toward STEM that targeted teachers’ engineering self-efficacy and outcome expectancy. Additional survey items were used to collect information about their individual background characteristics. Using data collected at three time points, we pursued research questions examining the immediate impacts of the PL on teachers' self-efficacy and outcome expectancy, plus the sustainability of these changes over time. Pairwise comparisons were made across time points within the year-long program, and multiple cohorts (2023, 2024) were included in these analyses (n=165). The 2024 cohort participants’ self-efficacy became increasingly positive over the 2024-2025 academic year, along with their reported outcome expectancy. The 2023 cohort teachers who stayed active in the PL program also reported increases in their self-efficacy, which were significant, during their second year.
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8621-1006
Purdue University – West Lafayette (College of Engineering)
[biography]
The full paper will be available to logged in and registered conference attendees once the conference starts on June 21, 2026, and to all visitors after the conference ends on June 24, 2026