2026 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

A Systematic Review of Structural Equation Modeling Practices in Engineering Education

Presented at Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM) Poster Session

This method work-in-progress paper presents a systematic review of structural equation modeling (SEM) practices in engineering education research. SEM has become an increasingly prominent quantitative method for modeling complex relationships among latent constructs such as motivation, engagement, and self-efficacy. As engineering education researchers aim to test theoretically grounded models of learning and behavior, SEM offers a framework that integrates measurement and structural modeling. However, as SEM has become more accessible through software such as AMOS, Mplus, SmartPLS, and lavaan, concerns have emerged about methodological rigor, transparency, and adherence to best practices. Despite the growing number of SEM-based publications, no comprehensive methodological review currently exists describing how SEM is applied, validated, and reported in engineering education.

This ongoing review follows the PRISMA framework. Searches were conducted across six databases ERIC (via EBSCO), APA PsycINFO, Engineering Village, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, and Education Research Complete using combinations of the terms “Structural Equation Modeling,” “SEM,” “Path Analysis,” and “Latent Variable Modeling” with “Engineering Education.” The search retrieved 6,513 records. Following de-duplication, 1,316 unique studies remained and are currently undergoing eligibility screening based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria using Rayyan. Articles are being coded for SEM family (covariance-based vs. variance-based), estimation method, software used, sample adequacy, reliability and validity reporting, fit indices, missing data treatment, model modification rationale, and testing of measurement invariance. Coding is conducted independently by two reviewers to ensure inter-rater reliability.

Preliminary findings suggest that most SEM applications in engineering education rely on covariance-based modeling and cross-sectional survey data. While internal consistency reliability (e.g., Cronbach’s α) is frequently reported, evidence of construct validity (e.g., AVE, HTMT) and justification for estimation techniques are often lacking. Several studies report post-hoc model modifications without theoretical grounding, and few conduct multigroup or longitudinal invariance testing. These trends highlight the need for improved methodological transparency and reporting standards in SEM research within engineering education.

Upon completion, this review will provide a systematic synthesis of SEM practices in engineering education. Findings aim to inform reporting guidelines, methodological training, and quantitative research capacity-building among engineering education researchers.

Keywords: Structural Equation Modeling (SEM); Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA); Path Analysis; Measurement Invariance; Methodological Rigor; Engineering Education

Authors
  1. VINCENT OLUWASETO FAKIYESI University of Georgia [biography]
  2. Dr. Nathaniel Hunsu The University of Georgia [biography]
  3. ISAAC DAMILARE DUNMOYE University of Georgia [biography]
Note

The full paper will be available to logged in and registered conference attendees once the conference starts on June 21, 2026, and to all visitors after the conference ends on June 24, 2026