Developing students’ metacognitive regulation and effective use of learning strategies is central to supporting adaptive learning in engineering education. This qualitative single-case study examined one undergraduate engineering student’s metacognitive regulation and use of learning strategies across four semesters that incorporated structured written reflection. The student’s 19 reflections were deductively coded at the element level of the three metacognitive regulation dimensions: Monitoring, Evaluating, and Planning. The students’ texts for each element were classified for level of detail (None, Vague, or Sufficiently Detailed), and each dimension assigned an overall proficiency level. In parallel, the student’s knowledge and use of learning strategies, as communicated through their reflections and pre-post surveys, were analyzed. Results indicated overall movement from Emerging toward Developing and, in some cases, Proficient engagement across the three dimensions, though growth was uneven across semesters. Improvements were most evident in elements that required concrete descriptions, while elements requiring abstract thinking remained more inconsistently articulated. The student’s level of detail was lowest for Planning. Across semesters, growth in knowledge of learning strategies reflected increased frequency of Consolidating-Surface and Acquiring-Deep strategies. These findings suggest that sustained instructional support plays a critical role in developing metacognitive regulation. Instructors should continue supporting students with clear feedback and instructions from the reflection activities, especially for elements that require sensemaking.
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3635-1825
University of Nebraska - Lincoln
[biography]
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1558-2579
University of Nebraska - Lincoln
[biography]
The full paper will be available to logged in and registered conference attendees once the conference starts on June 21, 2026, and to all visitors after the conference ends on June 24, 2026