This full paper employs the push–pull model as a theoretical lens to examine how curricular and departmental interventions can shape students’ major decision-making processes within a first-year engineering program. Selecting an engineering major is one of the most consequential decisions undergraduate students make, to shape their academic trajectory, define career pathways, and impact their persistence in engineering. Yet many first-year students enter college with limited understanding of available majors, misconceptions about disciplinary content, or uncertainty about aligning personal interests with professional goals. This study used a pre-post survey to try to solve this challenge and investigate the factors of students’ major decisions.
A mixed-methods approach was used to evaluate the impact of these interventions. Quantitative pre- and post-surveys administered throughout the semester captured changes in students’ awareness, confidence, and perceived influences on their major choice. Within the push-pull model to analyze students’ major selection, push factors of major decisions refer to forces that motivate students to seek additional guidance; While pull factors represent features that attract students toward informed and confident choices. Two complementary interventions were designed to activate these dynamics: (1) curriculum-embedded modules, in which individual students and teams investigate a specific engineering discipline, analyze its curriculum and career pathways, and share findings with peers; and (2) cross-departmental workshop panels featuring faculty, advisors, alumni, and industry professionals who provide authentic insights into disciplinary practice, essential professional competencies, and pathways to employment opportunities.
Preliminary findings suggest that integrating push–pull dynamics into the first-year engineering curriculum enhances students’ knowledge of available majors, strengthens their decision confidence, and promotes alignment between self-perceptions, interests, and disciplinary fit. These results highlight how curriculum-integrated and cross-departmental panel interventions can support informed and intentional major selection, offering practical guidance for institutions seeking to improve student persistence and satisfaction in engineering programs.
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2508-8454
University of North Carolina at Charlotte
[biography]
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4346-8140
University of North Carolina at Charlotte
[biography]
The full paper will be available to logged in and registered conference attendees once the conference starts on June 21, 2026, and to all visitors after the conference ends on June 24, 2026