2026 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Revising the ASEE Code of Ethics: A Community Process

Presented at Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS) Technical Session 5

This theory paper argues that the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Code of Ethics should apply to professionals in a broad rather than narrow sense. A code of ethics is a representation of a community's obligations within a particular context. A narrow sense of a code’s application connotes a narrow sense of professionalism: that technical membership in a profession exhausts the ethical reach of that profession. The field of engineering education, including research and practice, has grown and matured in the last few decades into an exemplar of a broad sense of professional membership, driving the need for a revision to the ASEE Code of Ethics. The explication of our process stands as a case study evidencing the importance of a broad sense of applicability for codes of ethics.

Earlier ASEE codes of ethics assumed that all society members would likely be “covered” under their individual disciplinary code of ethics. The first code recognized that the roles of engineering educators would include additional expectations as well as overlapping disciplinary obligations across the education and enculturation lifecycle. However, engineering educators are not just engineers but include librarians and scholars in the humanities, social sciences, math, sciences, and entrepreneurship, and others. Given the relational and complex reach of many professional fields and domains, an ASEE code should apply to all who support the development of engineers through formal education. As with many other professional societies, we argue that our ethics code should apply to all engineering educators, whether or not they are members of ASEE. As a community of educators, we have macro ethical obligations to society and the learners we serve. Addressing this need motivated additional changes to the code.

This paper describes the process leading to this central claim, including our review and revision process for the ASEE Code of Ethics, the Code of Conduct for Participants at Meetings and Events, and Code of Conduct for Volunteers, as well as our committee policies and procedures. Revisions were benchmarked with recent revisions to ethics codes for several other professional associations relevant to engineering education, informal review by expert colleagues, a special session to review and discuss proposed changes during the 2024 Annual Conference, and a period of public comment and feedback during 2025. We illustrate the motivation and reasoning behind some of the decisions about words, phrases, and focus that resulted in the updated version.

Because we want the Code to be effective and have value for the community, future work requires community education and interaction with the Code. Special sessions at conferences, webinars, and formal and informal conversations can motivate engagement for engineering educators. Specifically, an associated special conference session at the 2026 Annual Conference will continue the work of education and convergence around the updated Code of Ethics within our community.

Authors
  1. Prof. Rebecca A Bates Minnesota State University, Mankato [biography]
  2. Dr. Sharon A. Jones P.E. University of Washington [biography]
  3. Dr. Rosalyn W. Berne University of Virginia [biography]
  4. Dr. Angela R Bielefeldt P.E. University of Colorado Boulder [biography]
  5. Dr. Andrew O. Brightman Purdue University – West Lafayette (College of Engineering) [biography]
Note

The full paper will be available to logged in and registered conference attendees once the conference starts on June 21, 2026, and to all visitors after the conference ends on June 24, 2026