2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Navigating the AI Ethics Frontier: A Cross-national Comparison of AI Policy Documents for Developing Responsible AI Workforce

Presented at Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS) Technical Session - Ethics in ML/AI

With the rapid growth of Artificial Intelligence (AI), and the world becoming a global village, the ethical implications of AI are gathering concerns from the technologists, policymakers, and ethicists around the globe alike. Given the powerful impact of AI and its ability to shape the lives of human beings in the coming years, it is of utmost importance to nurture responsible AI engineers who can design ethical AI systems. To be able to nurture such engineers, it would be helpful for educators to understand existing efforts to govern AI ethically and responsibly. In this paper, we focus on the five stakeholders of AI, namely: the USA, Great Britain, European Union, China, and India. The reasons for selection of these countries are the significant role they play on the global level, their population diversity (India and China present one-third of the world's population, a population that migrates in huge numbers to the other three regions mentioned above), and varying cultural perspectives.

This paper analyzes the documents that discusses the AI policy of each mentioned country, to take a deep dive into the frameworks that were developed for regulation of AI technology. The paper will introduce the policy documents presented by the governments and then conduct comparative analysis. We will answer the following question: What are the similarities and differences in ethical concerns and mitigation strategies discussed in the policy documents across these five countries? The findings of this study will allow the engineering faculties to see a comprehensive picture of the existing efforts to govern AI ethically, and incorporate these in education of engineers of tomorrow. Naturally, the educational implications of the findings will also be discussed.

Authors
  1. Emad Ali Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University [biography]
  2. Bailey Kathryn McOwen Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University [biography]
  3. Arsalan Ashraf Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University [biography]
  4. Dr. Dayoung Kim Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University [biography]
Note

The full paper will be available to logged in and registered conference attendees once the conference starts on June 22, 2025, and to all visitors after the conference ends on June 25, 2025