2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Impact of International Short-Term Faculty-Led Programs on Pedagogical Techniques in Engineering

Presented at International Division (INTL): Measuring and Assessing Outcomes and Impact 

STUDENT PAPER

The demand for short-term faculty-led programs and virtual global learning to develop students’ global learning experiences has grown. Since 2020, these programs have gained significant traction, yet few studies report on instructor outcomes from leading these types of programs. Both instructor recruitment and changes in their perspectives from participating in these experiences need to be evaluated. At this university, three approaches are taken to provide students the opportunity to engage in global learning (outside of traditional exchange programs). The first approach is through short-term faculty-led programming (7 – 14-day travel program). The second approach is virtual only learning known as global classrooms (referred to as COIL in this paper) at this university is an expansion of Collaborative Online International Learning (COIL) pedagogy that allows for a deepened global engagement for students without the need for international travel. The third approach is COIL+ programs, courses that are full or part of term with a virtual component combined with an optional (or occasionally required) post-course short-term faculty-led program. The objective of this study is to qualitatively analyze and evaluate the impact of recruitment and program experiences on the instructors who run these types of programs. Through the use of a post-travel nineteen-question instructor survey, we gain insight into instructor experiences and how engaging in short-term faculty-led programming (both with and without a global classroom component) has impacted their pedagogical practices. The instructors answered several Likert-Scale and open-ended questions. These include questions about teaching strategies, technology, global classrooms, and student learning perceptions. The survey questions were analyzed using an inductive approach to coding the data to uncover common themes. The results indicate that instructors who participate in these programs gain valuable insight into integrating cultural and technological elements into their teaching practices beyond short-term faculty-led courses as well as their community-based research programs.

Authors
  1. Joshua E. Katz Orcid 16x16http://orcid.org/0009-0001-3320-2536 University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign [biography]
  2. Hannah Dougherty University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign [biography]
  3. Ernest-John Ignacio Orcid 16x16http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9916-953X University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign [biography]
  4. Dr. Brian Woodard University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign [biography]
Note

The full paper will be available to logged in and registered conference attendees once the conference starts on June 22, 2025, and to all visitors after the conference ends on June 25, 2025

« View session

For those interested in:

  • Advocacy and Policy
  • Broadening Participation in Engineering and Engineering Technology
  • engineering
  • Faculty
  • gender
  • professional