Since the inception of the NSF Revolutionizing Engineering Departments (RED) Program in 2015, RED teams have worked to implement significant changes in engineering education. To facilitate such revolutionary changes in higher education, requirements were put in place by NSF to ensure that RED teams are composed of individuals in various institutional roles who hold diverse skills. Most of the RED teams have experienced some PI and senior personnel turnover during their funding period, and they have had to work hard to maintain team cohesion and momentum amidst those changes.
This paper will explore two concepts that can help build and maintain team cohesion, namely psychological safety within a team, and capacity to resolve conflicts in a psychologically safe and productive ways. Psychological safety is a shared belief held by team members that the other members of the team will not embarrass, reject, or punish them for speaking up (Edmondson, 1999). Inclusive and efficient teams are key to generating innovative, cross-cutting, and sustainable changes in higher education. Research suggests that for the most success, high-performing teams must continually and actively foster psychological safety among the team members. However, even in the presence of psychological safety, conflict will occur. Teams that have built capacity to respond to that conflict productively (Grenny et al., 2022, Heen & Stone, 2010) can reestablish psychological safety and enable progress.
This paper will review results of a group working session involving 42 members of 12 current and past RED teams. The session focused on identifying the level of psychological safety within the RED teams, as well as strategies that have helped RED teams foster psychological safety and resolve conflict constructively within their own teams. The paper will present the data collected through a validated survey (Edmondson, 1999) and discuss research-based strategies that can be utilized to foster psychological safety and productive conflict resolution. Furthermore, the paper will present an overview of strategies that RED teams have identified as useful for fostering psychological safety and for building conflict resolution capacity, and examples of behaviors that can suppress psychological safety on their teams.
The findings from this paper are domain agnostic and highly transferable, and therefore will be of value to any individual working in a team setting, especially change agents working in teams, as teams that foster psychological safety have been shown to produce more innovative changes (Kark & Carmeli, 2009).
The full paper will be available to logged in and registered conference attendees once the conference starts on June 22, 2025, and to all visitors after the conference ends on June 25, 2025