Evidence-Based Instructional Practices (EBIPs) are pedagogical approaches grounded in research that enhance student learning, engagement, and retention. These methods, such as active learning, problem-based learning, and peer instruction, have been shown to improve both short- and long-term learning outcomes, particularly in fields like engineering, where students often face complex, abstract concepts and large class sizes. EBIPs help bridge the gap between theoretical knowledge and real-world application, fostering critical thinking and problem-solving skills that are essential in engineering education. Despite their known benefits, many engineering faculty struggle to implement EBIPs due to limited training, time constraints, and a lack of discipline-specific resources.
This NSF-funded project seeks to increase the adoption of EBIPs in undergraduate engineering courses by identifying and addressing the specific contextual barriers and affordances that faculty face during implementation. Faculty often report challenges such as insufficient time for curriculum redesign, a lack of professional development opportunities, and institutional cultures that prioritize research over teaching innovation. To address these challenges, the project focuses on three key activities: (1) investigating the decision-making processes and contextual challenges faculty encounter when implementing EBIPs; (2) co-developing course materials and curriculum to align with EBIP strategies; and (3) creating research-informed resources to support EBIP-based course development.
This project engages faculty from over 40 institutions, including R1 universities, undergraduate-focused colleges, minority-serving institutions, and two-year colleges. By capturing faculty experiences across this diverse range of educational environments, the project aims to develop scalable, adaptable strategies for EBIP implementation. Faculty participants are paired with experienced mentors who provide ongoing, tailored support to address discipline-specific challenges. These mentors assist in curriculum redesign, pedagogical guidance, and troubleshooting barriers, facilitating a deeper understanding of how EBIPs can be integrated effectively.
In this poster, we present key findings from the project, focusing on the contextual barriers faculty encounter during the decision-making process of implementing EBIPs, and the strategies used to overcome these challenges. Case study examples from the participating institutions illustrate both the struggles and successes faculty experience under the scaffolded guidance of a faculty mentor. These case studies offer a window into the process of curriculum transformation, highlighting practical approaches to integrating EBIPs and providing rich, detailed descriptions of the change process.
The full paper will be available to logged in and registered conference attendees once the conference starts on June 22, 2025, and to all visitors after the conference ends on June 25, 2025