In academia, data collection plays a fundamental role. It serves multiple purposes, from assessing student learning outcomes to evaluating the effectiveness of instructional methods and developing more efficient methodologies to improve the educational process. This paper explores the distinctive characteristics, purposes, and challenges inherent in data collection and organization from capstone projects, emphasizing the contrasting nature of data collection approach for regular courses.
Regular courses are from a student’s academic journey, having structured curricula and standard assessment methods. Data collected from regular courses typically focus on tracking student performance and evaluating the effectiveness of instructional strategies. The assessment data consists of quantitative measurements. It includes tools like exam scores, assignment marks, lab completion rates, attendance records, and course feedback evaluations. Frequently, data are centered on tracking students' advancement and pinpointing areas where instructional methods, curriculum design, and classroom management can be enhanced. Instructors and educational professionals employ this information to fine-tune their teaching strategies and to aid students who face challenges.
On the other hand, capstone projects reflect a conclusion of students' academic experience and emphasize the practical knowledge and skills they acquired for their future professional development. In addition, capstone projects require engaging students in the constraints of the real world to understand what it takes to achieve social value for the proposed solution, and at the same time, attain the promised performance and innovation aspects. The data derived from capstone projects typically possess a qualitative character, demanding thorough analysis. It encompasses subjective evaluations, problem-solving aptitudes, project management abilities, communication capabilities, and teamwork skills.
The data collection process for this study is conducted at the Electrical and Computer Engineering Program of a US public engineering institution. The satellite campus is situated in Qatar and adds an international dimension to the capstone projects.
This paper confronts a few challenges arising from the differing characteristics of data derived from capstone projects. Data from regular courses can be readily quantified and lend themselves to more straightforward statistical analysis. However, they may not capture the full intricacies and depth of a student's development and progress. In contrast, capstone project data provides rich qualitative, multidisciplinary, and context-driven information. However, they are more challenging to quantify and assess, requiring a detailed rubric that aligns with the capstone projects’ objectives.
Are you a researcher? Would you like to cite this paper? Visit the ASEE document repository at peer.asee.org for more tools and easy citations.