2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

The Success and Retention of Students Using Multiple-Attempt Testing in Fundamental Engineering Courses: Dynamics and Thermodynamics

Presented at Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM) Technical Session 18

The Success and Retention of Students using Multiple-Attempt Testing in Fundamental Engineering Courses: Dynamics and Thermodynamics
First name Last name1, First name Last name 1, First name Last name 2, First name Last name 2, First name Last name 3, and First name Last name 1
1Department One
2Department two
3Department Three
University
Abstract
The notion behind Multiple-Attempt Testing continues to be investigated for its benefits in terms of students’ overall success and their retention in fundamental engineering courses. Two engineering courses were delivered in mixed-mode in Spring 2023 (post-COVID): Dynamics and Thermodynamics, whose results were compared to the same courses given in the same semester, four years earlier, delivered in mixed-mode in Spring 2019 (pre-COVID). All four courses were large classes ranging from 167 students for Spring 2023 in Dynamics to 267 students in Thermodynamics for the same Spring 2023 semester.
For both courses, there were three tests during the semester. In Spring 2019, students were given a five-day window to conduct their tests in the testing center (TC). Facilitated by the Learning Management System (LMS), the grades were instantly uploaded into CANVAS. Once the test closed, students were allowed to see their work with a teaching-assistant to learn from mistakes and claim some partial credit where possible. However, in Spring 2023, for both courses, students were given three tests during the semester with three attempts each, as well as a make-up final cumulative examination, also with three attempts, for those who wanted to improve their grades. No partial credit was given in any attempt of any test or the final examination. Each attempt was open for two days and the students were allowed to see their tests after each attempt, learn from mistakes, and prepare better for the next attempt.
The effectiveness of this testing-interwoven-learning method lies in the fact that students are comfortable and less anxious to do their tests knowing they have other chances, can learn from their mistakes and focus their attention on their weaknesses, enhance their knowledge, and do better in the next attempt. With this self-paced method students learn a lot on their own given the amount of videos provided them.
The study shows a substantial decrease in the failure rate, 65% and the overall DWF decreased by more than 40% in both courses. This suggests students aspired to do well in every attempt, or even if they failed all three tests, they would still have a final examination that could save them, which reduced the overall DWF. A survey was also conducted, revealing more than 70% of students preferred this method of testing and learning in future courses.

Authors
  1. Michelle Taub University of Central Florida [biography]
  2. Sierra Outerbridge University of Central Florida [biography]
  3. Harrison N. Oonge University of Central Florida [biography]
Download paper (1.94 MB)

Are you a researcher? Would you like to cite this paper? Visit the ASEE document repository at peer.asee.org for more tools and easy citations.