This Research paper considers an adaptability framework for providing insight into faculty development in the face of engineering being slow to adopt best practices in teaching. As traditional change models (e.g., Diffusion of Innovations) have not produced the results that are hoped for, a look through a lens of adaptability has the potential to help identify how to assist instructors implement and sustain a wide array of teaching practices and strategies (WATPS) during and after times of change. The purpose of this study was to quantify the variability of adaptability of engineering instructors at a United States R1 Midwest university using the Cognitive-Behavioral-Emotional adaptability model instrument. Females’ Cognitive/Behavioral and Total Adaptability scores were found to be statistically higher than males. These differences had a medium or large effect size as indicated by Cohen’s d. No statistically significant differences were found for academic position or rank. Differences found may be attributed to work culture; lack of differences may be attributed to individuals with a certain adaptability profile being drawn to a career in academia. Accounting for adaptability when considering the extent to which WATPS are used can enable more individualized support for instructors during periods of change.
Are you a researcher? Would you like to cite this paper? Visit the ASEE document repository at peer.asee.org for more tools and easy citations.