2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Community Perspectives on Chemical Engineering Education

Presented at Chemical Engineering Division (ChED) Technical Session 2: Community Retrospectives

This study investigated faculty perceptions and needs salient to the future of the journal Chemical Engineering Education (CEE). Specifically, we sought to understand (a) how faculty use CEE and what they value about it; (b) barriers and improvements to publication and use; and (c) perceptions of the “Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Consideration Requirement,” which began in 2021. To guide this work, we posed the following research questions: 1) What is the perceived utility of CEE? How do faculty use CEE? What do they value about the journal?; 2) What are the opportunities for improvement? What barriers preclude publication and use?; and 3) What are the perceptions of the “Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Consideration Requirement,” which began in 2021? We also analyzed the data for an overarching question: What values, attitudes, and beliefs do chemical engineering faculty express about practitioner-focused and discipline-specific education research publications? We conducted focus group interviews representing different CEE constituents (e.g., those who read but have not published, those who have published often) and represented varied perspectives (professional track, tenure track, tenured, varied institution types). As a first step, we report the analysis of a set of five focus groups, including 12 faculty members total. We found that many faculty appreciated the practical nature of the journal for its capacity to offer inspiration for teaching and widespread impact. When asked about the DEI requirement, some faculty raised concerns, being careful to express that they valued DEI, but showing uncertainty about how, for instance, a description of a laboratory experiment could meet this requirement. This discussion suggests a need to support authors publishing under the new DEI guidelines. In this paper, we summarize some of the initial findings from this work and also seek to continue and broaden the conversation with the community through presentation in the ASEE Chemical Engineering Division.

Authors
  1. Milo D. Koretsky Tufts University [biography]
  2. Dr. Lisa G. Bullard, P.E. North Carolina State University, Raleigh [biography]
  3. Prof. Joshua A. Enszer University of Delaware [biography]
Download paper (829 KB)

Are you a researcher? Would you like to cite this paper? Visit the ASEE document repository at peer.asee.org for more tools and easy citations.