MOTIVATION: The Biomedical Engineering Design collaboration (BMED) at Clemson University (CU) in South Carolina and Arusha Technical College (ATC) in Tanzania is a global experiential learning program centered on innovation of biomedical technologies. BMED creates international learning opportunities for undergraduate engineering students at both institutions. It helps meet the growing demand for skilled biomedical engineers in the expanding healthcare and medical device industries.
PROJECT: Our faculty saw the need to improve BMED by: 1) creating more consistent competencies and teaching methods across partners; 2) offering more opportunities for students to build cross-cultural and practical skills in biomedical engineering design; and 3) including underserved communities. In response, we developed a new BMED hybrid exchange model that blends global competencies with both virtual and in-person exchange experiences. Aligned with a pragmatic paradigm, we applied Situated Learning Theory (SLT) to emphasize that learning happens best when situated within authentic activities, contexts, and communities of practice, with knowledge gained through active participation and social interaction. SLT focuses on: i) learning by participating in a community of practice; ii) the context and environment where learning happens; and iii) involving both novices and experts in the learning process.
METHODOLOGY: Our central research question is: to what extent, and in what ways, is student engagement in an international clinically embedded biomedical engineering community of practice altered by different types and levels of participation in a BME-focused global experiential learning program? Using a mixed-methods approach, we assess student development of a global mindset and characterize essential SLT constructs. Quantitative data include a global mindedness scale for the constructs of perceived personal growth, professional growth, and cultural growth. Qualitative data include coding and analysis of participant interviews and reflective writing prompts for the constructs of community setting, relationships between novices and experts, and activities, artifacts and identities.
RESULTS: This project connects biomedical students across continents to build global perspectives. We defined the context as an international, clinically-embedded BME community of practice in four countries (USA, Tanzania, Germany, France) involving both novice and expert participants. Four existing global health courses were modified to align learning outcomes with competencies defined by the Consortium of Universities for Global Health and the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology. We integrated activities that required in-person and virtual engagement and the use of hands-on activities to reinforce students’ comprehension of design thinking concepts. After receiving obtained institutional review board approval, we piloted the new BMED hybrid exchange with 12 students. The first full cycle is underway, involving 47 CU students in three courses and 9 ATC students in one course. This approach expanded access to a clinically embedded global exchange program in biomedical engineering: 47% (32/68) of students participated in international in-person exchanges, and 53% (36/68) took part in hybrid exchanges. CU and ATC students learned from each other through these exchanges while engaged in activities in healthcare facilities, biomedical research labs, and med-tech companies across South Carolina and abroad.
The full paper will be available to logged in and registered conference attendees once the conference starts on June 21, 2026, and to all visitors after the conference ends on June 24, 2026