Traditional approaches to teaching risk and scheduling in construction education often rely on qualitative risk matrices and deterministic activity durations, limiting students’ understanding of how time and cost emerge from field operations. This paper presents a procedural, equation-based pedagogical framework that links scheduling and risk reasoning to unit-price formulations grounded in productivity. The framework decomposes a main construction activity into elemental activities and expresses each cost component through explicit material, labor, logistics, and equipment terms. Activity durations are derived consistently from the same productivity assumptions embedded in the unit-price equations. To introduce uncertainty, variability in operational parameters (e.g., productivity rates and consumption quantities) is modeled through simple stochastic formulations and propagated via simulation to obtain probabilistic cost and duration outcomes. The approach is illustrated using a worked construction example with documented deterministic inputs (Appendix A) and a focused stochastic demonstration on a selected elemental-activity branch (Appendix B), supported by a reference implementation (Appendix C). Learning objectives emphasize (1) causal understanding of productivity-driven cost–time relationships, (2) formulation of transparent unit-price equations, and (3) interpretation of probabilistic outputs. Results show that the framework supports these objectives within a controlled instructional setting, shifting instruction from tool execution toward procedural reasoning.
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1044-4687
Tecnologico de Monterrey, School of Engineering and Sciences
[biography]
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9975-9847
Tecnologico de Monterrey (ITESM)
[biography]
Are you a researcher? Would you like to cite this paper? Visit the ASEE document repository at peer.asee.org for more tools and easy citations.