There have always been challenges facing engineering education. Today’s challenges include preparing students to address complex socio-technical issues, managing the cost of a degree, navigating the increase of engineering knowledge, and how technologies are impinging on student learning. The National Science Foundation RED project at [redacted] University hypothesizes that addressing these issues can best be achieved by expanding individual pathways for students, enabling an engineering education that is broader and more intersectional with other disciplines.
To better align the difficult work needed to expand student pathways through a curriculum in the highly constrained structure of most engineering degree programs, the [redacted] RED project adapted the capabilities approach which asserts that development—individual, economic, and societal—occurs when individuals have the access to personally meaningful capabilities, real and accessible opportunities, they can convert into societally recognized achievements that have real value to the person. In this framework student opportunities are identified at multiple levels, from those required for all human thriving to those specific to engineering students. This opportunity set informs outcomes, which in turn have the potential to foster student achievements that are societally recognized. Adopting the capabilities approach shifted our internal perspectives beyond educational outcomes to the role that opportunities (capabilities) and achievements (functionings) play in education. As our RED project wraps up we have concluded that ABET’s outcomes-based approach limits the ability of engineering education to adapt to changing circumstances and times.
This poster compares the framework that underlies ABET to the capabilities approach, highlighting strengths and weaknesses of both. The ways that ABET-derived and capability-based frameworks intersect with the rest of the curriculum are highlighted, as is how the capabilities approach can be used to highlight barriers to pursuing a wider array of curricular pathways.
The full paper will be available to logged in and registered conference attendees once the conference starts on June 21, 2026, and to all visitors after the conference ends on June 24, 2026