This paper presents a case study examining the integration of Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR)-based geospatial analysis with the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) as an applied instructional approach for teaching terrain stability and hazard mapping in civil engineering education. The study aims to enhance students’ capacity to interpret geomorphologic processes, analyze high-resolution geospatial data, and apply structured decision-making methods within a hazard-assessment context relevant to infrastructure resilience and sustainability. Multi-temporal LiDAR-derived Digital Elevation Models (DEMs) from 2014, 2018, and 2020 were processed in ArcGIS Pro to generate geomorphic parameters including slope, aspect, curvature, elevation, Topographic Wetness Index (TWI), and DEM of Difference (DoD) to characterize terrain variability and surface deformation. AHP, following Saaty’s methodology, was employed to weigh these parameters through pairwise comparisons and consistency ratio (CR) validation. The weighted overlay analysis produced a landslide susceptibility map classified into five risk zones: very low, low, moderate, high, and very high. A mixed-methods assessment strategy was used to evaluate educational impacts. Quantitative analysis was based on pre- and post-instruction questionnaires measuring students’ performance in AHP weighing, CR computation, and weighted overlay implementation, with results indicating measurable gains in technical accuracy and procedural understanding (mean post-instruction CR = 0.02). Qualitative analysis drawn from open-ended responses from post-instruction reflective questionnaires, which revealed improved student confidence in geospatial reasoning, enhanced ability to interpret terrain indicators, and stronger connections between geomorphic parameters and slope-failure risk. The findings suggest that integrating LiDAR analysis with AHP as a curricular case study promotes computational literacy, data-driven decision-making, and geospatial interpretation. Limitations of the study include the single-course implementation, modest sample size, reliance on self-reported qualitative feedback, and the absence of field-based validation within the instructional module. Future work will expand the framework across multiple courses and institutions, incorporate InSAR-based deformation analysis, and integrate field verification to strengthen both predictive capability and educational generalizability.
The full paper will be available to logged in and registered conference attendees once the conference starts on June 21, 2026, and to all visitors after the conference ends on June 24, 2026