This research paper investigates the impacts of incorporating inquiry-based laboratory experiences into core undergraduate chemical engineering courses on chemical engineering faculty instructors at a research-intensive university in the Northeast United States. While the benefits of active learning in STEM are well-documented, its adoption among chemical engineering faculty remains slow. Our institution is transforming its curriculum to include hands-on labs and engage faculty as change agents. We present results from a concurrent mixed-methods study that used surveys and interviews with four faculty before and after implementation. Findings reveal the most salient barriers—resources, preparation time, and class time—and how they manifest in context. Future work will track changes in faculty attitudes through longitudinal surveys and interviews. By understanding our faculty’s current enthusiasm for active learning, we can better plan and inform our own change efforts, as well as those in other disciplines and institutions. The author team would prefer to present this paper as a talk.
Are you a researcher? Would you like to cite this paper? Visit the ASEE document repository at peer.asee.org for more tools and easy citations.