Graduate students have integral roles in teaching and research in higher education, cultivating inclusive classroom and lab environments as graduate teaching assistants (GTAs) and research mentors. GTAs and research mentors can promote a sense of community and belonging within their departments through their interactions with undergraduate students, peers, staff, and faculty. Proper pedagogical training enables graduate students to clearly communicate in their graduate and post-graduate careers, provide transferable skills in effective research mentorship, improve the quality of undergraduate education, and reduce the teaching time commitment for faculty instructors. Unfortunately, graduate students in STEM are often expected to serve as TAs without sufficient training in pedagogical best practices. To meet this need, we designed and implemented a graduate student-led course titled "Evidence-based Approaches in Effective Teaching and Research Mentorship" that has been offered four times from 2022-2025 to a total of 51 participants.
Our 10-week seminar course aims to train graduate TAs to be effective and equitable educators, mentors, and communicators throughout their careers. The course is peer-led by a team of graduate student instructors and a department lecturer, and has three primary learning objectives. Participants should be able to (1) build practical skills for defining and accomplishing course or communication objectives; (2) implement actionable inclusive strategies to foster belonging and equity within the (classroom) community; and (3) for a final project & presentation, develop a tangible plan for applying effective teaching and communication skills to achieve personal and professional goals.
In this study, we evaluated the effectiveness of the course through participant accomplishment of stated learning goals as well as measuring changes in participant self-efficacy as educators. In post-course survey data (n = 29-31), respondents strongly agreed that the course allowed them to achieve the three learning goals with a combined average score of 4.58 ± 0.56 on a 5-point Likert scale. Additionally, participants showed improvement in their self-efficacy as instructors after comparing pre- and post-course evaluations of teaching preparedness: 2.67 ± 0.99 pre-course vs. 4.27 ± 0.69 post-course. Respondents strongly agreed that the Bioengineering department needed a course on pedagogy and communication skills with an average score of 4.55 ± 0.83.
While the course was originally designed to address the needs of graduate TAs and research mentors, we believe that the course materials may be directly relevant to faculty interested in further developing their pedagogical and communication skills. Faculty sponsors reflected positively on their experience participating in and ability to learn new skills and theory through the course. In the future, we envision expanding course engagement to a broader audience, either by inviting faculty from the department to course discussions or by presenting course materials to faculty members in workshop format. Current ongoing work includes longitudinally tracking course participant outcomes in their later roles as TAs or research mentors within the bioengineering department to investigate long-term course efficacy. We hope that this work will catalyze the implementation of similar training-based courses to improve the pedagogical preparation of graduate TAs and faculty alike.
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2962-6245
Massachusetts General Hospital
[biography]
The full paper will be available to logged in and registered conference attendees once the conference starts on June 21, 2026, and to all visitors after the conference ends on July 31, 2026