Summer Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) programs are widely positioned as mechanisms for broadening participation in engineering, yet the perspectives of families, who authorize participation, navigate access barriers, and interpret program value, remain underexamined. Grounded in the Hoover-Dempsey and Sandler (H-DS) model of parental involvement, this study investigates how parents of students in a large urban city center define the value and effectiveness of STEM summer programs and what program design features they believe support continued educational engagement beyond the summer. Using a mixed-methods design that integrates a parent focus group and a post-focus-group survey (n = 7), the study identifies four interconnected dimensions of family-defined value: confidence and STEM identity, real-world relevance, access and safety, and mentorship/representation. Mapping these dimensions to the five levels of the H-DS model demonstrates that parental involvement in informal engineering education contexts extends beyond the decision to become involved to include opportunity brokering, academic socialization, and reinforcement processes that parents associate with proximal outcomes (confidence, belonging, willingness to persist) and expected distal outcomes (continued participation, pathway exploration, and aspirations). Implications emphasize designing programs that reduce structural barriers, integrate identity-affirming mentorship, communicate transparently with families, and connect engineering activities to community and career relevance.
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3375-1519
The University of Texas at San Antonio
[biography]
The full paper will be available to logged in and registered conference attendees once the conference starts on June 21, 2026, and to all visitors after the conference ends on June 24, 2026