Human communication, whether through writing or speech, involves both consciously and unconsciously selected words. The words chosen with deliberate intent often convey specific meaning and serve as the primary carriers of content in discourse. In contrast, function words, such as prepositions, pronouns, auxiliary verbs, and conjunctions, are frequently selected unconsciously and play a critical role in maintaining grammatical structure rather than imparting substantive meaning. Despite their lack of referential content, function words are essential for sentence cohesion and reflect subtle aspects of cognitive processes. By systematically analyzing students’ usage patterns of function words, researchers can infer underlying cognitive strategies, levels of motivation, and dimensions of self-concept, offering valuable insights for educators into their pathways of academic development.
This study employs Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC) software to analyze functional word use in reflective reports from students in an upper-division, project-based engineering program. Drawing on the work of Chung & Pennebaker (2007), the analysis explores linguistic indicators of motivation, drive, self-reflection, analysis, and honesty. The reflective assignment requires students to respond to four prompts: what happened, what was the take-away, what is the future use of the take-away, and what other learning would be valuable, with a weekly cadence. These are intended to encourage deep personal learning, build metacognitive skills, and strengthen critical thinking. The data represent all 119 students in the program from conception of the degree program in 2013 to Spring 2024, with many having participated for four semesters resulting in a total of 4638 entries for examination.
We compared motivations for achievement, power, and affiliation from the group of student engineers to the values for other populations from published studies drawing on a range of writings. Findings show that the student engineers from this program use function words that align with: (1) achievement motivations more often, (2) power motivations less often, and (3) affiliation motivations about as often, in comparison to other populations. These results provide insights into the motivations, engagement, and persistence of student engineers in the program studied. Future work will disaggregate the data to examine the evolution of student engineers during their time in the program. Additionally, collecting and analyzing data from engineers in industry would provide a benchmark for comparison.
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0753-2707
Minnesota State University, Mankato
[biography]
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1614-9590
Minnesota State University, Mankato
[biography]
http://orcid.org/https://0000-0002-1550-3474
Minnesota State University, Mankato
[biography]
The full paper will be available to logged in and registered conference attendees once the conference starts on June 21, 2026, and to all visitors after the conference ends on June 24, 2026