2026 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Enhancing Reflexivity in Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methodological Approach for Studying Engineering Students

Presented at Conversations about Qualitative and Mixed Methods II

In this Full Method paper, we explain a procedure for reflexively analyzing qualitative data about engineering students. While reflexivity is crucial to understanding students’ perceptions, experiences, and choices, well-structured and replicable methods for incorporating reflective practices in studies of engineering students remain limited. To address this gap, we developed a protocol for enhancing reflexivity in engineering education qualitative data analysis. We demonstrate our systematic, transparent protocol method using example semi-structured interview data gathered from a larger study of engineering transfer students at Sunshine University (pseudonym), a large, public, selective, research-intensive university in Florida. To demonstrate the flexibility of the analytic protocol, the sample includes students from various backgrounds and engineering disciplines.

Our layered protocol is grounded in Reflexive Thematic Analysis and takes influences from intersectional and antideficit frameworks. To enhance reflexivity in the analysis, we used research team positionality statements and participant demographic characteristics as inputs for deeper attention in the protocol. Our data analysis protocol, titled Intersectional Reflexive Analysis Protocol (IRAP), is as follows: first, while qualitatively coding, the researcher identifies instances when a student discusses aspects of their background; second, the researcher reflects on the passage in their reflexive journal noting initial thoughts; third, the researcher creates a profile card for each participant while acknowledging intersecting identities. Our multistep protocol facilitates researcher reflexivity on their positionalities and the participants’ experiences.

Authors
  1. Caroline Lubbe University of Florida [biography]
Download paper (490 KB)

Are you a researcher? Would you like to cite this paper? Visit the ASEE document repository at peer.asee.org for more tools and easy citations.