Writing-to-Learn (WTL) strategies are widely promoted to support conceptual understanding and self-regulated learning in engineering education, yet classroom-scale evidence remains mixed. This study examines the implementation of a WTL framework with embedded self-regulation prompts in a core undergraduate engineering course across three instructional cycles. The intervention integrated problem rationales, structured learning plans, self-evaluations, and reflective writing within regular coursework, and student responses were evaluated using analytic rubrics aligned with cognitive, metacognitive, and motivational dimensions. Descriptive analyses revealed modest and uneven outcomes. While aggregate performance gains were inconsistent, rubric-level patterns suggested meaningful variation in students’ written reasoning and self-regulatory engagement across cycles. Participation in reflective components declined over time, highlighting sustainability challenges. Rather than advancing strong causal claims, this study contributes implementation-level evidence and practical design insights for integrating WTL with self-regulation prompts in engineering courses.
Are you a researcher? Would you like to cite this paper? Visit the ASEE document repository at peer.asee.org for more tools and easy citations.