Adaptive learning in engineering education has long excelled at error detection, yet research on the systematic transformation of diagnostic insights into pedagogical actions remains rare. This study advances a design-based, mixed-method inquiry grounded in systems-engineering epistemology and informed by model-based reasoning and cognitive load theory. The proposed diagnostic–pedagogical framework unifies Item Response Theory (IRT), Cognitive Diagnostic Modeling (DINA), and Large Language Models (LLMs) within a coherent architecture of adaptive instructional design. IRT estimates learner readiness along continuous ability trajectories, DINA models the structural interdependence of skills, and LLMs contextualize diagnostic evidence by mapping conceptual relationships across course-specific multimedia resources. Through greedy and gradient-based orchestration, the framework operationalizes adaptivity as an optimization of learning flow, allocating resources that balance diagnostic precision with cognitive economy. The system generates evidence-based feedback grounded in an awareness of cognitive fatigue that draws on prior learning materials and encourages conceptual refinement rather than repetitive review. This model was tested using 1,000 simulated and 726 actual Engineering learners, and validated through student interviews and expert reviews, demonstrating that adaptive learning can function such that psychometric rigor, instructional design, and human judgment coalesce to sustain meaningful, cognitively attuned progress.
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5971-214X
Purdue University – West Lafayette
[biography]
The full paper will be available to logged in and registered conference attendees once the conference starts on June 21, 2026, and to all visitors after the conference ends on June 24, 2026