This paper presents a novel pedagogical experiment in a graduate-level engineering course, designed to assess how students integrate newfound knowledge and expertise when utilizing conversational AI as a constrained project assistant. Our primary goal was to move beyond the typical "AI as a tutor" model to establish the AI as an effective "guide," requiring students to generate content from their own knowledge base while using the AI solely for structural critique, redirection, and resource navigation. The core of the study involved a structured, two-phase project proposal exercise. Early in the semester, before formal introduction to core course topics, students drafted an initial proposal for a physics-aware deep learning project, leveraging a conversational AI assistant whose information output was programmatically limited (e.g., restricted to providing only conceptual definitions or structural feedback). A second, identical proposal was drafted at the end of the semester after all technical topics had been covered. We hypothesize that the knowledge gained throughout the semester would significantly improve the quality and technical depth of the final proposal. More critically, we aim to decouple the effect of knowledge gained (understanding concepts) from expertise gained (skilled interaction with the AI tool). The evaluation utilizes a mixed-methods approach. Quantitative metrics are derived from the students' tracked interactions with the conversational AI. Qualitative and self-reported measures are collected via surveys at the end of each assignment, which capture their evolving confidence in using the AI as an assistant rather than a solution provider.
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4056-8309
North Carolina State University at Raleigh
[biography]
Are you a researcher? Would you like to cite this paper? Visit the ASEE document repository at peer.asee.org for more tools and easy citations.