This NSF-funded EAGER (Award #2438112) explores how the strains experienced by socioeconomically disadvantaged students’ (SDS) traditional and chosen families are “passed down” to SDS and shape their sense of belonging in engineering. Belonging, or students' sense of fit, support, and comfort in engineering, is well established and a pivotal factor for SDS’ persistence and success. Yet, little is known about how the struggles of family and supporters that SDS rely on are passed through students’ ecosystems to influence that belonging.
We are using a qualitative case study narrative approach with 15 S-STEM SDS scholars as focal cases. After narrative interviewing involved each SDS, each nominates up to ten traditional or chosen family and support persons. We then interview those individuals as well. Data collection also includes member-checking and triangulation across multiple voices to create rich case narratives that map (1) the strains faced by supporters, (2) how those strains are passed on to students, and (3) the ways these passed-down strains shape engineering belonging over time.
Preliminary findings from student and supporter interviews indicate that different supporter types face different burdens. Traditional family members often carry long-term financial pressures, heavy labor demands, or personal traumas that limit the emotional and material support they can provide. Yet, that emotional support is integral to belonging development. Chosen family members such as mentors, coaches, advisors, or professors tend to confront institutional bureaucracy and use their system knowledge to help students navigate requirements, funding hurdles, or campus processes, sometimes without realizing the positive extent of their influence. Across both groups, empathy emerges as a key factor: professors and mentors who talk openly about mental health, treat students as whole people rather than just academic performers, and show themselves as real human beings play an outsized role in sustaining students’ belonging. These findings highlight that both the material strains of traditional families and the institutional navigation taken on by chosen families shape students’ experiences, underscoring the importance of considering the broader support ecosystem rather than the student alone.
By centering the experiences of SDS and their supporters, this project contributes to theory on belonging and offers practical guidance for programs like S-STEM to design interventions that account for both students and the networks they rely on. At present, we have interviewed students and we are currently in the process of conducting interviews with students’ traditional and chosen family members to deeper our understanding of how supporter strains shape students’ experiences. Future work will mix these familial perspectives with that of students into case narratives, compare patterns between different types of supporters, and identify intervention points where institutions can strengthen the capacity of both families and chosen networks to sustain students’ belonging in engineering.
The full paper will be available to logged in and registered conference attendees once the conference starts on June 21, 2026, and to all visitors after the conference ends on June 24, 2026