Could not find session

2026 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

IUSE: Motivation and Cognitive Engagement in Engineering Courses: Employing a Learning Management System to Present Pre-Requisite Content for Classroom Preparation

Presented at NSF Grantees Poster Session II

Academic motivation and in-class cognitive engagement are affective measures that positively impact learning and performance in higher education. This research article quantifies the academic motivation and in-class cognitive engagement of students in four separate engineering courses at three different universities when prerequisite content is assigned before class using a Learning Management System (LMS). The content was assigned weekly to students in mechanical, electrical, civil, and industrial engineering programs prior to lecture, facilitating the implementation of active learning within a blended classroom model.

Academic motivation and cognitive engagement were measured using two established instruments from existing literature: the MUSIC Model of Academic Motivation and the Student Course Cognitive Engagement Inventory (SCCEI). The MUSIC model encompasses five dimensions of the academic motivation construct: Empowerment, Usefulness, Success, Interest, and Caring. The SCCEI also has five dimensions that align with the ICAP (Interactive, Constructive, Active, and Passive) framework for active learning: Peer Interactivity, Constructive Notetaking, Active Notetaking, Active Processing, and Passive Processing.

For each course, descriptive statistics for the various dimensions of the MUSIC and SCCEI instruments will be presented and discussed, and comparisons will be made among the courses. Correlations between the MUSIC and SCCEI dimensions will also be explored. The results from the four courses will allow comparison across contexts, including different academic levels, universities, engineering majors, and subjects. This study is part of a larger study to compare two online platforms for presenting and assessing pre-class, pre-requisite content in engineering courses. The two platforms are the CANVAS learning management system (LMS) and the RealizeIT adaptive learning platform (ALP), which is designed for personalized education. Our goal is to identify the preferred platform based on these affective measures as well as direct measures of student learning.

Authors
  1. Dr. Renee M Clark University of Pittsburgh [biography]
  2. Kelly Maren Kibler University of Central Florida [biography]
Note

The full paper will be available to logged in and registered conference attendees once the conference starts on June 21, 2026, and to all visitors after the conference ends on June 24, 2026