2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Statics and Dynamics: A Case Study of Supplementing Traditional Lectures with High Impact Practices such as Multiple-Attempt-Testing and Project-Based-Homework

Presented at ME Division 10: Innovation in the Sophomore Year

Statics and Dynamics are two essential core fundamental gateway courses for Mechanical and Aerospace engineering majors, whose fail rates are one of the highest observed in engineering courses. By introducing different pedagogical high-impact practices, such as Multiple-Attempt Testing (MAT) and hands-on Project Based Homework (PBH), we have attempted to improve these success rates. MAT was introduced for Dynamics since Spring 2021 and has proven to be successful over the past few years. PBH has been part of the Statics curriculum since 2016. However, we have yet to study the combined implementation and impact of using both High-Impact Practices (HIP) in these courses.

This paper presents the results of incorporating MAT and PBH into the Statics and Dynamics courses. A baseline was created by using the Spring 2019 semester that did not implement any practice, then PBH and MAT were inserted during Spring 2023 and Summer 2024. Classes were delivered either face-to-face or in a blended mixed mode where students watched videos and/or did adaptive learning assignments to acquire some understanding before coming to class to solve problems with their instructor. After class, they could do other assignments, such as take-home quizzes, problem-solving assignments, and tests with multiple attempts. These MAT were conducted in the high-integrity testing center of the College of Engineering. The tests were automatically graded in Canvas, the institution’s Learning Management System (LMS), and students saw their scores instantly. With the help of the teaching assistants (TAs), students were permitted to see their tests and learn from mistakes before their subsequent attempt. Although based on the same concepts, the following attempts for the same test were different due to the large pool of question banks. In Statics, students completed PBH that had them create a physical model, measure results, solve it analytically, compare the results (analytical vs experimental), present a report, and create a small video of them explaining the case and discussing the results.

Students completed entry and exit survey questionnaires gauging their self-regulatory and motivational learning processes in these courses. In this paper, we present our experiences implementing, a detailed analysis of the learning outcome and student self-reported results, and discuss the lessons learned from this educational model. These surveys confirmed the students strong positive reactions to the methodology presented herein.

Authors
  1. Dr. Ricardo Zaurin University of Central Florida [biography]
  2. Michelle Taub University of Central Florida [biography]
  3. Sierra Outerbridge University of Central Florida [biography]
  4. Harrison N Oonge University of Central Florida [biography]
Note

The full paper will be available to logged in and registered conference attendees once the conference starts on June 22, 2025, and to all visitors after the conference ends on June 25, 2025