In this paper, we explore the impacts of a pilot course entitled “Effective and Enduring Advocacy: Leading with Compassion in STEM” on both students and instructors through collaborative autoethnography. The pilot course was developed to augment the technical, problem-solving mindset integral to engineering curricula and identity with tools grounded in critical consciousness and compassion, recognizing the crucial role of community-centered advocacy work in creating positive change both in our STEM-focused institutions and the world beyond. Instructors acted as guides while students used self-reflection and dialogue (peer-to-peer and student-to-teacher) grounded in critical pedagogy to discover how their unique identity, experiences, and positionality could support them in actively transforming our world in ways they believe will make life, love, and liberation more possible.
We have chosen to report the outcomes from the first iteration of the course through collaborative autoethnography, connecting the individual and shared experiences of both students and teachers to the broader challenges and opportunities which this course aimed to address. The present research team is therefore comprised of the pilot program’s organizers and instructors (two graduate students at the host institution and two external professors from different fields) as well as several program participants (including a junior undergraduate student, three graduate students, and a postdoctoral researcher). We embrace this participatory research approach as a natural extension of the self-reflective, dialogical, and student-centered course structure.
The research team has collectively identified that the role of community was vital in shaping positive and effective course experiences for both students and instructors. We explore how creating and maintaining a community-supported space for self-reflection, peer-to-peer learning, and instructor-student interactions promoted effective, enduring, and diverse advocacy actions. This collective inquiry is especially significant due to the context of our STEM-focused institution, allowing us to probe opportunities to augment and evolve STEM curricula and support a stronger sense of self, belonging, and agency for students and teachers alike. In addition to this broader context, the stories, experiences, perspectives, and connections documented in this autoethnography will inform future iterations of this course as it grows into a multi-institutional program, continuing to support and unite STEM students throughout their advocacy journeys.
The full paper will be available to logged in and registered conference attendees once the conference starts on June 22, 2025, and to all visitors after the conference ends on June 25, 2025